Site-Wide Activity

We’re still being exploited today. The rebuilding of the World Trade Center Tower recently didn’t get done without support from our tax dollars. Yes, I know that private companies paid the majority of the cost but how many billions in tax incentives did the project reap? Amazon recently pulled out of a deal that would have saved it a billion…[Read more]

Tyson is accused of creepy behaviour which caused one woman to quit the TV show she was working on.  It doesn’t sound that serious, however, it made one woman quit her job.  He didn’t apologise.

Dr. Tyson described the first two instances as harmless gestures. He denied the allegation of rape.

Krauss is accused of grabbing a woman’s breast.  I ca…[Read more]

Not another bloody outrage over false accusations of rape. Jesus fucking christ.

What is bullshit is obsessing about this problem solely through the lens of women accusing rape. There is a bias screaming out in most of these complaints and it focuses on three things. 1 Rape is a different kind of crime than other crimes. 2. Women often claims…[Read more]

PB, religiousness or religiosity?

Didn’t the misinformation always exist? The press and later the web told people it existed.

Here is one I intended to put in Sunday School.

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

an article on conspiracy theory worth a read

Thx Reg. Can’t remember where I heard it, but the invention of the printing press caused the biggest surge in religiousness ever seen. Now, misinformation can spread worldwide in a matter of hours, and the science of disinformation keeps evolving and spreading.

Simon Paynton wrote:

What’s the alternative? That nobody complains? People have to be able to make complaints.

The alternative is to involve law enforcement and allow the state to prosecute as with all crimes. Anything less, such as a tweet or a facebook post, usually years or decades later is bullshit. We have to stop treating women like they a…[Read more]

What’s the alternative?  That nobody complains?  People have to be able to make complaints.

_Robert_ wrote:

Are you looking to defy the bell curve? Some people can carry rocks, others can design great structures and others can control the show. The castle was not built to trap tourists. It was built to protect the locals behind it’s walls when the hoards showed up to pillage, rape and plunder. Cathedrals were built to display the p…

[Read more]

Why have I never seen that picture before!! Most excellent!!

The rain it raineth on the just

And also on the unjust fella: But chiefly on the just, because

The unjust steals the just’s umbrella.

Are you looking to defy the bell curve? Some people can carry rocks, others can design great structures and others can control the show. The castle was not built to trap tourists. It was built to protect the locals behind it’s walls when the hoards showed up to pillage, rape and plunder. Cathedrals were built to display the power of the church.…[Read more]

Yes Tom I found that too:

Tom – I have previously debunked several claims made in other “evidence” you have linked regarding the EU hypothesis…

I have not claimed to have debunked the EU hypothesis, only much of what was offered in evidence to support it and only in the links provided. I will re-post it later and you can explain to me where I am wrong.

Reg, I scrolled down the Home Page list and found a post by you that starts with “I have previously debunked….”

I counted 25 posts but before you see this post, posts or deletions by others may alter the count.

@ PopeBeanie, here is an article on conspiracy theory worth a read.

OK Tom but I remember almost everything I posted over the last 9 years and every debate and discussion I was engaged in. I have no recollection of using the word “debunk” in the context you stated. I have access to the old TA site and cannot find it. However it was mostly only on AZ that I pointed out where I found what you posted from…[Read more]

Reg, TA’s computer may have those posts but I won’t request a search. They might disclose that rather than replying to the arguments you supplied, I pointed to evidence for the EU.

P

@Tom – please show me where I suggested that “debunk” required only my opinion and I will hold my hands up. I doubt if I would consider my subjective opinion as a valid reason to negate an hypothesis. I did not debunk EU, I just supplied arguments based upon what I know of Physics which appeared to undermine many of its arguments. You never…[Read more]