Bookish atheists

Go Set A Watchman… Fraud???

This topic contains 11 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  SteveInCO 3 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1623

    Winter Lily
    Participant

    I saw something online that had about there being some controversy about Harper Lee’s new book Go Set A Watchman calling the book a fraud. Here is a link to the page: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/07/25/opinion/joe-nocera-the-watchman-fraud.html?referrer=&_r=0

    • This topic was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by  Winter Lily.
    #1688

    .
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s a fraud…

    #1689

    Winter Lily
    Participant

    @BelleRose I don’t think of it to be a fraud either but they seem to be talking about whether or not its actually new. Some think that it’s not new and so they then go and call it a fraud.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by  Winter Lily.
    #1690

    .
    Participant

    My understanding is it was written FIRST (a long time ago)….but never published…until now 🙂

    #1693

    Winter Lily
    Participant

    @BelleRose That’s what my understanding of it is too. But then why call it a fraud?

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by  Winter Lily.
    #1695

    .
    Participant

    Because people are stupid, lol!!

    #1696

    Winter Lily
    Participant

    @BelleRose LoL! ?

    #1697

    Winter Lily
    Participant

    @BelleRose So since Go Set A Watchman was written in mid-1950s and To Kill A Mockingbird was written in the 1960s then the proper thing todo is to read Go Set A Watchman first? Right? But Harper Lee never truly meant for Go Set A Watchman to be published so instead she wrote and published To Kill A Mockingbird Which people thought was the first book and that Go Set A Watchman is the second book when in fact it’s the first. Don’t mind me I’m just a bit confused as to which one to read first.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by  Winter Lily.
    #1700

    .
    Participant

    Well, most people have already read To Kill a Mocking Bird….and not to give any spoilers but….for some people it’s devastating because the impressions that were left with after To Kill a Mockingbird are turning out to….be different than they thought…and we’ll leave it at that….

    I would read To Kill a Mockingbird first….I think that’s the point, even though it was written second, I think reading in the order published will give you the biggest WOW…personally….

    But don’t substitute my judgement for your own;)

    #1716

    SteveInCO
    Participant

    Wait though.

    And I admit upfront I’ve not read either book, but I don’t think you should find it devastating that stuff an author never intended to publish, that was written before the “canonical” work (TKAM) contradicts the work.

    It’s entirely possible that as she thought about the characters, she decided to send them in a different direction from what she showed in earlier, unpublished works. And that may even be the reason she never published GSAW, because the characters were in fact different people.

    It’s like complaining that a first draft has differences from the published story, except that its the author’s conception of the character that has evolved, not the plot line. (Please don’t confuse this with a character changing over time in the published work, that is ordinary character development. This is the author recasting the character entirely.)

    #1731

    .
    Participant

    @steveinco

    There are a few very specific reasons why I advised to read To Kill a Mockingbird first….and if I explain it it will give it away….

    #1796

    SteveInCO
    Participant

    Based on what little I know, I’d read it first… then take the other one with a grain of salt, it’s not necessarily the same set of characters.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.