<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atheist Zone | Arcus | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Arcus.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 17:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff779df393c7db540e99d9544de21dcf</guid>
				<title>Arcus replied to the topic The Strong See Brutalizing the Weak As Their Prerogative. Only the... in the forum Politics</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/the-strong-see-brutalizing-the-weak-as-their-prerogative-only-the/page/2/#post-3550</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:11:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/the-strong-see-brutalizing-the-weak-as-their-prerogative-only-the/#post-3548" rel="nofollow ugc">Tom Sarbeck wrote:</a><br />
<a href="https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/" rel="nofollow ugc">@arcus</a> asks, ‘Why such militarized language?’ I’ve been there. Try it some day.</p></blockquote>
<p>And where is &#8220;that&#8221; exactly? Which dictatorship imprisoned and tortured you?</p>
<p>Admittedly I find expressions like the one in this post juvenile of the &#8220;I&#8217;m 14, and this is deep&#8221; type.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8545ffad2059716b6555ee9349f6b75</guid>
				<title>Tom Sarbeck replied to the topic The Strong See Brutalizing the Weak As Their Prerogative. Only the... in the forum Politics</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/the-strong-see-brutalizing-the-weak-as-their-prerogative-only-the/#post-3548</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 02:09:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Arcus</a> asks, &#8216;Why such militarized language?&#8217;<br />
I&#8217;ve been there. Try it some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b4fb7f9606dcc6cedfce785a54eba62</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Burn Baby Burn in the forum Theism</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/burn-baby-burn/page/2/#post-3124</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:02:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Arcus</a> &#8211; if people find that that model works for them, then good luck to them.  I&#8217;m not going to argue against its correctness, since it&#8217;s a cousin of a model that I agree with.  There&#8217;s more than one way of looking at a complex situation.</p>
<p>But if it&#8217;s claiming to be a complete moral framework (i.e. an underlying structure on which to hang the r&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5394"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/burn-baby-burn/page/2/#post-3124" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2575dfc58f1592c224740eef1be6c6ce</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Burn Baby Burn in the forum Theism</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/burn-baby-burn/page/2/#post-3101</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:44:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://atheistzone.com/members/arcus/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Arcus</a> &#8211; &#8220;<em>While these models are good, they are a bit convoluted</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; I prefer Haidt&#8217;s to Schweder&#8217;s model.  I don&#8217;t find them convoluted at all &#8211; I&#8217;ve had no reason to disagree with them, I find that they match up with the overall evolution of morality, starting with the &#8220;second-personal&#8221; relationships within the small groups of our pre-human&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5365"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/burn-baby-burn/page/2/#post-3101" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>