<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atheist Zone | Brightsky | Activity</title>
	<link>https://atheistzone.com/members/clearsky/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://atheistzone.com/members/clearsky/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Brightsky.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1821c200f6c34d9ed40b5a87d625e121</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/5/#post-11007</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:38:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Good points from unseen &amp; Simon Payton.</p>
<p>Even public intellectuals like Sam Harris in his book &#8221; the moral landscape&#8221; <em>could not </em> appreciate this concept. As he tried to argue for a <em>scientific </em>facts based <em>(as you say)</em> <em><strong>proofs</strong></em> to these types of moral questions. Which I don&#8217;t think is possible. In the way that you can find say proofs for examp&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14194"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/5/#post-11007" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f160befd11a238643c78091ee901adcb</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/5/#post-10998</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:28:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>
<blockquote><p>Thanks Davis for your detailed and interesting reply.</p></blockquote>
</li>
<li>If you get more stuff let the people on this topic know so we can hopefully discuss it.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d29a1589af3f1f961f37331ab8aee74</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10978</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:28:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read that are a variety of approaches in deontology.</p>
<p>Ranging from a Kantian absolutist one to more moderate approaches.<br />
For example Kant famously wrote this.</p>
<p>Better the whole people should perish,” than that injustice be done (Metaphysics of Morals Kant 1780)</p>
<p>Injustice= breaking a categorical imperative.</p>
<p><strong>Absolutist </strong>conceptions of de&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14164"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10978" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0ef3fa6eeb6bf30bbc07a7a9e178cd72</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10966</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK thanks Reg I will have a look to see if its on Kindle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42520f0f8238adda7bafad8f93fb9a73</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10962</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 20:30:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep Simon I agree with what you say completely.</p>
<p>However there is some scientific evidence which shows that countries who try to use egalitarian social policies have better social outcomes.</p>
<p>One book I read which tries to demonstrate this is &#8221; The Spirit Level&#8221; which you may have already&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14145"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10962" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b21a73e1a926311a9d071700816115e7</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10955</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veil of ignorance thought experiment by <strong>John Rawls.</strong></p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" width="670" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/A8GDEaJtbq4?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance?wprov=sfla1" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance?wprov=sfla1</a></p>
<p>Maybe another <strong>Intuition</strong> <strong>pump </strong>for atheist to arrive at ethical answers?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it the same as utilitarianism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6c95a4ca007fd8230f7b699b70f1bd85</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10948</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 12:36:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep Simon I agree it would be interesting but, to be honest I am not familiar with the subject of justice and legal theory. But from my little knowledge its pretty abstract &amp; for me complicated!</p>
<p>I was mainly concerned as to how one on a pragmatic level how ordinary people like myself work out ethical problems in everyday life.  Which I think you&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14131"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/4/#post-10948" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fae66f28e05d3b73f996b63f2b9b939b</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10945</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2018 10:43:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) The first comment, sounds to me like what people do in real life situations. When they face a dilemma when two ethical principles clash. In that one tries to see which is more important.</p>
<p>I read something called a <strong>reflective equilibrium </strong>process Prof John Rawls uses this process to arrive at principles of Justice.</p>
<p>Another person Norman D&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14128"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10945" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3bc1c433786b524d064007f6c1b4270f</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10914</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas and comments here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a4e6441d8c870de5eef6f51f03bc1a57</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10910</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:23:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my thinking there will be weakness in all the normative ethical frameworks. In my opinion it does not mean that they are complete failures.</p>
<p>One person in the comments gives examples is stealing.</p>
<p>It reminds me of Prof Kohlberg writings!</p>
<p>There is an interesting thought experiment which people may know already.</p>
<p>Related to the comments above&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14091"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10910" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">252fd76e08ed618b8109a9115456aefb</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/3/#post-10902</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>universalizability principle,</p>
<p>Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.</p>
<p>In my opinion is one important aspect where it is very different to the &#8221; Golden rule&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">936fd85e7a8b0d3faff93445028aa9b1</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10893</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:59:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK there is some good points about the difficulty of finding &#8221; universal moral values &#8221;</p>
<p>With good examples, about values being in the realm of personal subjective opinion. Which I think is true.</p>
<p>Maybe &#8221; universal &#8221; is not the correct term.</p>
<p>I used that word as I was thinking about The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).</p>
<p>Are these&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14074"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10893" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42e8bde3762478c0e9c6a5ae13f2bff8</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10889</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:10:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the comments from different people above there&#8217;s a lot of good and valid opinions there.</p>
<p>You mention the &#8221; Golden Rule&#8221; what&#8217;s your opinion on that compared to &#8221; the categorical imperative &#8221;</p>
<p>Do you think its possible using purely rational methods to arrive at universal moral principles?</p>
<p>Instead of relying on religious moral precepts?</p>
<p>Is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14070"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10889" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">726ff1a5f566a7ed18ae9729168a01e4</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10882</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 22:49:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all the statements above. It is very difficult maybe almost impossible. But I was thinking in terms of applied ethics.</p>
<p>What does one do in real life situations. Which I agree its difficult or maybe impossible! To logically arrive at the &#8220;right&#8221; values based answers?</p>
<p>But some how ordinary everyday people ( atheist or believers) I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14064"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10882" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">59fe75aadb76b4172f06026f9596b828</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10874</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 21:51:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Agree, what does a person do when one has conflicting Kantian duties? You know to tell the truth, but also to preserve life! ( axe murder example who is looking for a victim).</li>
<li>Do you think it would be possible to understand the main normative ethical frameworks and use a combination of all 3 to arrive at a sensible and practical solution. For&hellip;</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14056"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10874" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">982cc50847a1ea2f66bc1965d2c04fe4</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic When Life Became Sentient in the forum Small Talk</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/when-life-became-sentient/page/4/#post-10870</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:10:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting discussion here, enjoying all the input from both sides.</p>
<ol>
<li>One thing I would like to ask Mr Earl Sanborn is how do the people who believe in God explain the problem of evil in the world.</li>
<li>Both evil caused by man and also natural disasters?</li>
<li>I&#8217;ve done some basic reading on it like some of Alvin Plantinga stuff,</li>
<li>And Peter&hellip;</li>
</ol>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14052"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/when-life-became-sentient/page/4/#post-10870" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">51b2ab2309b290db2dde772489386c8b</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic What is [interpersonal] moral legitimacy, and do we need it? in the forum Science</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/what-is-interpersonal-moral-legitimacy-and-do-we-need-it/page/2/#post-10864</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 11:07:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe loading="lazy" width="670" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6J_xZo_HVJQ?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e005e6875786b2ca820cb29b4be3ff96</guid>
				<title>Brightsky replied to the topic When Life Became Sentient in the forum Small Talk</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/forums/topic/when-life-became-sentient/page/3/#post-10859</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:20:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Thanks for very interesting comments from everyone. I saw this TED talk which you guys may find interesting!</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li> https://youtu.be/oYp5XuGYqqY</li>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">65b19cea2983a50f16a5ed097eda80f0</guid>
				<title>Brightsky became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/14034/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:09:14 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>