michael17

The miraculous simply means we are powerless to do the same. UAPs defy Newtonian physics, and we are powerless to do the same. Being non-baryonic helps.Your defense of miracles only makes sense if miracles actually happen, and you cite everything we can’t do or explain as evidence of God. And not just any God (…[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

Likewise, just because tbere is theory, like evolution, you can not jump to the conclusions that there is no god as was done in the Victorian age. Moreover evolution may address change within a phylum but not the creation of phylums nor biogenesis nor the efficient engineering of thermodynamic, electrical and…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

@michael “Astro-physicists are currently baffled and going back to their chalk board.” We know your conclusion, Michael, even when you don’t state it explicitly. “Therefore, God must exist,” right? We already know that things at the time of the Big Bang were not “normal” in the sense of comporting with the physics that became normal…

[Read more]

TJ wrote:

More accurately, scientific discoveries can be presented agnotologically. This typically results in incorrect interpretation of the data, for the express purpose of misrepresenting it. The purpose of misrepresenting the data, is typically driven by no credible data being available to use instead. So, finding that stars formed in better…

[Read more]

Luke 21:26

King James Version

26 Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken

The Olivet prophecies are spot on!

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

Unseen wrote:

In any case, there is no absence of chaos, is there? Or can you prove absence of chaos?

Chaos is suppose to be there, is the point, but there’s not. So who or what is doing the restoration?

There you go again, asserting there’s no chaos. Show us, then, that there is no chaos.

The authors ass…[Read more]

PopeBeanie wrote:

ChatGPT gave me a great explanation of planetary orbital dynamics, including interactions, but got wishy-washy on what scientific consensus is on how well Lyapunov time calculations can explain very long time frames, or the future of planetary orbits. In the article you cited, I also didn’t see any strong support for, or s…

[Read more]

Michael17, Couldn’t a body from outside the Solar System of sufficient size and gravitational pull come in and mess with the orbits of any of the Planets or Dwarf Planets, whether Inner Solar System or Outer Solar System? Yeah, I know I’m throwing in a hypothetical, but is it any less possible than the notion of “fi…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

In any case, there is no absence of chaos, is there? Or can you prove absence of chaos?

Chaos is suppose to be there, is the point, but there’s not. So who  or what is doing the restoration?

Unseen wrote:

What exactly do you mean by the lack of chaos among the inner planets (Mercury through Mars, I assume)? Are you referring to chaos as defined in chaos theory where relatively small fluctuations can result in major consequences? Mercury’s orbit is often described as chaotic in a different sense of the word.

The calculated Lyapunov t…[Read more]

michael17, is it evident to you how your world view colors your lens accordingly? Not that objectivity is possible for humans and yet any form of ideology/orthodoxy renders a flawed human an absolute trash receptacle. I don’t mean that in a bad way…it is just that

Theories or ideologies can be flawed, but evidence is what it is.…[Read more]

Michael17, Science is about postulates and theories based, respectively, on contingent interpretations of observations, and on the latest and most verifiable evidence. This is also how the science of medicine works; In the long run, in spite of previous beliefs and incorrectly purported proofs, demonstrably successful treatments…

[Read more]

Nice video on how confounded Big Bangers are.  And a High-Five to Creationist. (Not the 6000 years ago universal creationist). As there is evidence that a civiliation existed on earth 350 million years ago. I believe that more evidence will be unearthed in our lifetimes. Already unanomalous structures are detected in Anarctica on Google Earth.…[Read more]

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRvU9pnJ/

Angels?

“Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.”

michael17 wrote:

jakelafort wrote:

michael17, i read a book or two by Kaku. Later i heard him say some shit that made me lose respect for his intellectual integrity and acuity. And now this shit. Kaku speaks caca poopoo. https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2022/07/06/michio_kakus_embarrassing_stance_on_ufos_840226.htm

<li…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

michael17, i read a book or two by Kaku. Later i heard him say some shit that made me lose respect for his intellectual integrity and acuity. And now this shit. Kaku speaks caca poopoo. https://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2022/07/06/michio_kakus_embarrassing_stance_on_ufos_840226.htm

<li style=”text-align:…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

From michael17: You read the mainstream explanations. Which one has your vote? I don’t know. Mine is not to explain matters lacking sufficient evidence or expertise to describe. No shooting sparks here. I note that unidentified blank is a common occurrence. My supposition is that if it is not contrived by humans, not natural p…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

Doesn’t matter how satirical, clever or logical you are-ya ain’t gonna make a dent in the world view of michael17. The truth of the mythology is assumed and anything contradicting it is processed in his brain in a way consistent with the preservation of the mythology. I am not sure anyone could change Enco’s ideology eithe…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

“Spiritual explanations”? Like maybe Yahweh, Odin, Zeus, Ahura Mazda, Gautama Buddha, and Krishna all got together, held a seance, and as a result Yahweh decided to create the universe? Spiritualism like that?

There is a congressional conversation:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRvJa6e2/

However no scientific explanation is giv…[Read more]