<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Atheist Zone | Knowledge | Activity</title>
	<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for the group, Knowledge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 23:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3160c887283305fced0520d308892971</guid>
				<title>_Robert_ joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/44908/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">496cb33e0d4f23ffdb141189da823945</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56421</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:25:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56415" rel="nofollow ugc">Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:</a><br />
Your initial belief (before evidence) + new evidence = updated belief.</p></blockquote>
<p>That sounds very reasonable.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56420" rel="nofollow ugc">Unseen wrote:</a><br />
It is not single axioms that strike me as obvious, it is a system in which consequences and premises give one another mutual support.” — Wittgenstein, On Certainty, sec. 141-42</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s good too.  If ther&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44907"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56421" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">36b71df09f290672f659f061ccd49bf5</guid>
				<title>Unseen replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56420</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:34:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When we first begin to believe anything, what we believe is not a single proposition, it is a whole system of propositions. (Light dawns gradually over the whole.) / It is not single axioms that strike me as obvious, it is a system in which consequences and premises give one another mutual support.&#8221; — Wittgenstein, On Certainty, sec. 141-42</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7c3eedf0d4bbfc7f1d486752d99942e6</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56419</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:17:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordle 1,346 3/6*</p>
<p>&#x2b1b;&#x2b1b;&#x2b1b;&#x1f7e8;&#x2b1b;<br />
&#x2b1b;&#x2b1b;&#x2b1b;&#x1f7e8;&#x1f7e9;<br />
&#x1f7e9;&#x1f7e9;&#x1f7e9;&#x1f7e9;&#x1f7e9;</p>
<p>Bayes in action!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6425f0c0b98e20bf2364fb22171b082</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56417</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:54:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introduction to formal and informal fallacies.</p>
<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="CRITICAL THINKING - Fallacies: Formal and Informal Fallacies" width="670" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VDGp04CfM4M?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbab6e15b331d0338e056674a82b246e</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56416</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:51:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe loading="lazy" title="How to Learn Faster with the Feynman Technique (Example Included)" width="670" height="377" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_f-qkGJBPts?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">28329173c8964d73d2a97964c2de8d79</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56415</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a more detailed <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/" rel="noopener noreferrer" rel="nofollow ugc">explanation</a> of Bayes Theory. Don&#8217;t be put off by the Math as the concept is more important if you are new to it.</p>
<p>I guess I should allow for the word &#8220;belief&#8221; and not just &#8220;understanding&#8221; as I think we all know the I don&#8217;t mean religious belief, i.e. belief that is not open to revision.</p>
<p>Another example:</p>
<p>Think of Bayes’ T&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44901"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56415" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4e198e5fcff21d1d0e5c3d921633f458</guid>
				<title>TheEncogitationer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56413</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reg,</p>
<p>Just a few practical addendum for teaching these skills in learning and reasoning:</p>
<p>* Put the lessons in any and all possible media, electronic and hard copy.<br />
* Insist that anyone who teaches the lessons equally be able to exercise the lessons and they must not have any guarantee of tenure or sinecure.<br />
*. Don&#8217;t make the lessons compulsory;&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44900"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56413" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1efe973ecbcaaff255717a53b278e19b</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56411</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Unseen &#8211; The point you make about Columbus can be used as a basic example of Bayes Theory.  If he had being given new objective information about the location then he could have updated his understanding of what he had discovered. It would have changed his reality.  That is the essence of how Bayes works. It is not &#8220;shattering a belief&#8221;. It is d&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44898"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56411" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d4ee1ca1a4781d7654da003f18100d6</guid>
				<title>TheEncogitationer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56410</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:53:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reg,</p>
<p>How humans learn and properly reason is a matter of fact.  So it&#8217;s not that Gradgrind was wrong,  It just that how to learn and reason should be the first fact he teaches </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c14de0d5753f2811ec8dc7c7a36a66fd</guid>
				<title>Unseen replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56409</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know where to fit this in, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Christopher Columbus did not actually discover America because he maintained until his death that he had reached some portion of Asia. Doubts were emerging but it was Amerigo Vespucci who fully realized that the Americas were truly something else, calling them a &#8220;new world.&#8221;</p>
<p>The point: You can only claim&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44896"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56409" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d94b97bdf3eed78c95e6a13e16c98452</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56408</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:55:22 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that Bayesian reasoning was about extrapolating &#8220;what is&#8221; to &#8220;what might be&#8221;, thereby limiting new ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">00a3dd9c328e1cce4af0cce9283ebb7a</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56406</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Simon, Bayesian thinking is all about checking out new ideas. We don&#8217;t want kids to hold beliefs, we want them to have &#8220;understandings&#8221;. Then when a new idea (information) comes along, they will have the skills to reason through it and adapt their understanding accordingly.</p>
<p>Bayesian reasoning, logic, and fallacy recognition would do more&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44894"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56406" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">558c83b2290d71fb190ada28491423c5</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56405</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s brilliant Reg.  I&#8217;m not sure about Bayesian thinking though &#8211; it seems to repackage &#8220;what&#8217;s possible&#8221; as &#8220;based on what&#8217;s already the case&#8221; &#8211; not allowing in new ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cc2952f1138613ba2c1d7dc81f7cca8e</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Mr. Gradgrind was wrong. in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/mr-gradgrind-was-wrong/#post-56403</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:03:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have more to add but decided to start  with this. Let&#8217;s see how it develops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">759f0fdab4288dc867d5c4dd36517a9a</guid>
				<title>RichRaelian joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/38559/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:16:44 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f4f0822b35b27f912a20d4b9c8f7a973</guid>
				<title>Doug Hanlon joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/34013/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 08:48:52 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">09e1718115ff95722d367a942ddb9089</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33905</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:27:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m told that the Buddha taught that the mind is also a sense organ.  I think that&#8217;s true, we can use the mind to know things &#8211; to join dots, distill data into knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c0430a7c7866032f3751a50dca6f825</guid>
				<title>PopeBeanie posted an update in the group Knowledge: ARRRRRRGGGG!!!!
@unseen, I&#039;m sorry... I did NOT delete the [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24428/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARRRRRRGGGG!!!!<br />
@unseen, I&#8217;m sorry&#8230; I did NOT delete the update that you posted a few days ago, but then in the process of trying to explain what happened, I DID accidentally your newest update, along with my own klusterf#^%Y of an explanation. This update section is frustrating for you and I both. So I&#8217;ll just post the explanation in again,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24428"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24428/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f30a44ee1f95a8b5c650069c525112e</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33901</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33893" rel="nofollow ugc">Kristina wrote:</a><br />
I think it speaks to a certain reality of what it means to be correct or to know things.</p></blockquote>
<p>Someone said, there are at least two kinds of truth: 1) &#8220;correspondance&#8221;, where a proposition accurately captures reality; 2) &#8220;consistency&#8221;, where a proposition is logically consistent with other propositions that are known to have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24417"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33901" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0446541784e910a46094b06040b973d4</guid>
				<title>Kristina replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33893</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We run into a problem with the term &#8216;correct&#8217;. We need parameters for applying it. Correctness is relative to a number of variables such as desired outcome, acceptable margin of error, methodological limitations etc.</p>
<p>What is it she needs to know in this example? Does she need to know specifically the number of books as accurately and individually&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24411"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33893" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">620bf84b3c9971c430206aa13adc1ce0</guid>
				<title>--- joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24410/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:22:46 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">175eac40b2ebb3aa5e6c9de3b3bb1880</guid>
				<title>Simon Paynton joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24357/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:42:04 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff086e2d18efd07acc35b3a13f81beb6</guid>
				<title>Davis replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33811</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e190473a24d2f4e7c1b1637efa58d007</guid>
				<title>PopeBeanie replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33810</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking the brick was a book was just an incorrect assumption. She didn&#8217;t know that she was only seeing 14 books, and neither did she know that one or more books were hidden.</p>
<p>So she didn&#8217;t really <em>know</em> the correct book count (even though she <em>knew</em> how to count up to 15), she just accidentally and incorrectly <em>perceived</em> 15 books while one or more&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24339"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33810" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1f4d4b6b132e24eb532c53c7fcd285e9</guid>
				<title>Ivy replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33806</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:53:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered your question <a href='https://atheistzone.com/members/davis/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Davis</a>. Whether you liked my answer is a separate question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d4903d0359a26e7615208a724f16199e</guid>
				<title>Davis replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33805</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:37:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Ivy but answer the question as I posed it&#8230;you did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f2123a290528406311c8ee17c1f96267</guid>
				<title>PopeBeanie joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24331/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 06:34:45 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">813586207b960582d7c3ce4f66e0d724</guid>
				<title>Ivy replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33800</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 04:20:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://atheistzone.com/members/davis/' rel="nofollow ugc">@Davis</a> I did answer your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c2cb995b01d69316d3eb46fe0c206471</guid>
				<title>TheEncogitationer joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24328/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 04:15:47 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">20de467cfed235f82e06c94f1b42038c</guid>
				<title>Davis replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33798</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 02:48:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Unseen for answering the question. That&#8217;s an interesting explanation.</p>
<p>Ivy, I wish you had have actually answered the question as I had posed it. For example: is being correct contingent on knowing something? Can you truly be correct if it is only out of luck? It is a little similar to the stopped clock effect (where a stopped clock is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24327"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33798" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ddb9f1fce7594b9ad209baeabfb6c81f</guid>
				<title>Ivy replied to the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33797</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that yes ultimately she was correct, but she was lucky that there was a book behind the brick. Had there not been then she would not have been correct. How is that so complicated?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>People “think” they “know” a lot of things that they really don’t.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I’m not sure what the discussion was a couple of years ago, perhaps you could provi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24326"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/#post-33797" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5b91ca4082b908896af266810fe40a31</guid>
				<title>Belle Rose joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24325/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2020 00:53:39 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90a1b583142b76e854df7b8d5257182b</guid>
				<title>Reg the Fronkey Farmer joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24324/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 22:54:49 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d642fa4c3b827279262304e88bb0047c</guid>
				<title>Unseen posted an update in the group Knowledge: As with many questions, &quot;knowledge&quot; is a more complicated [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24323/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 22:54:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with many questions, &#8220;knowledge&#8221; is a more complicated topic than it seems. It is used different ways at different times by different people and for different reasons and uses. </p>
<p>However, there really are only two kinds of knowledge, aren&#8217;t there?</p>
<p>1) Certain knowledge and 2) contingent knowledge</p>
<p>1) If I&#8217;m wrong about a simple arithmetic&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24323"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24323/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7e885814e2fc7f38773c4c56a1178fda</guid>
				<title>Unseen joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24322/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 20:55:50 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">44d5da7a1c6d319109b9a0c053be3a89</guid>
				<title>Bio Bill joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24318/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e9e1940112835c0d0d608c1e1a71cab5</guid>
				<title>JadeBlackOlive joined the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24315/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8978fc37ec6fc18f51980577a6db72ef</guid>
				<title>Davis started the topic Back to the classic problem in the forum Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a few years since we visited this question. Perhaps a few people&#8217;s &#8220;minds&#8221; have changed on the issue. I&#8217;ll frame the question slightly differently from last time.</p>
<p>Someone is counting books on her bookshelf (from a distance) and counts 15 books. Little did she know one of the objects she thought was a book was a brick. Was she correct&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24310"><a href="https://atheistzone.com/groups/knowledge/forum/topic/back-to-the-classic-problem/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b73d9ca2db85c9cb7154b2877dd39a8d</guid>
				<title>Davis created the group Knowledge</title>
				<link>https://atheistzone.com/activity/p/24309/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:20:30 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>