Simon Paynton wrote:
@kyrani – so – Goddidit?

Even if the Universe is a creation/ simulation/ hologram, that is not enough evidence to say Goddidit.. but I do believe so!

Simon Paynton wrote:
@kyrani – if evolution isn’t true, then what is the alternative explanation for how all the animals and plants got here, and how the ground is full of fossils, which all link up into a family tree extending back from the present day, through geological history, getting generally simpler and simpler as we go backwards? You…

[Read more]

_Robert_ wrote:
So god is entertained by children with brain cancer….nice.

God does not give the children cancer, brain cancer or any other. Nor is God entertained by such. It is foul game play of inhumane people, who affect the mother or father or caregiver covertly in order to affect the child.

We are not puppets in a puppet show. We have f…

[Read more]

Simon Paynton wrote:
@Kyrani – how does Intelligent Design account for cancer? Was that a smart move? What about the river worm that burrows into the back of people’s eyeballs? Why did God Design that? What does Intelligent Design amount to, apart from Goddidit? Presumably, its explanatory power, when you come to a new situation, is limited to…

[Read more]

Strega wrote:
It’s a huge leap from Deism to Theism. That there could have been a sentient creator is a conceptually feasible idea. That this creator then gave a shit about a tiny blue dot in its massive creation is highly questionable. That human beings are then imagined not only to be the reason for the creation, but also involved in regular c…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
I do not believe your God exists because there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.
My opinion is based upon a lifetime of never seeing any evidence for any god. There is none. You have none. Kyrani Eade has none.

what answers do you think God can tell you that natural world science…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
Animals will adapt in accordance with their environment but that needs “a force to cause to guide it“. No. Evolution is unguided.

The proposed theory of Evolution claims that change is unguided but they are trying to justify this on the grounds of adaptation. Adaptation is NOT unguided. When environmental con…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
BTW do you really believe you are to become an immortal?

Yes, because I believe that God exists, though unknowable through intellect and reason.

I believe that God is the Ultimate Reality. And I believe that we are made in the likeness of God, that being primarily consciousness. So when we awaken fully, i.e., reach…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
Kyrani said: The growing consensus amongst physicists is that the Universe is a simulation, a hologram.

No, it is not. Please show the peer-review evidence to show this. Consensus is reached by the peer review process.

**********************************

I am not going to go chasing for research papers, better you…

[Read more]

caseydorman wrote:
Evolution, being change, is not the same as creation, which may be either change or the replacement of nothing by something. Evolution does not need a force to cause or guide it, as it is the shaping of survival outcomes of both nonrandom and random events according to their survival value in their environment. Creation may or…

[Read more]

Strega wrote:
@Kyrani. “Both sides are using scientific arguments”. I’ve yet to hear a scientific explanation for God – I hear the god of the gaps argument for things that science has yet to explain, but I’m fascinated with the idea that science backs religion in some way. I thought religion was all about faith, and faith by definition was unsup…

[Read more]

Sorry, I did not explain myself very well.

Using bad language in talking about God is often called blasphemy, but this is not real blasphemy. Blasphemy is misrepresenting God. Making statements (suggestions really) that God is…[Read more]

Yes, as far as I understand, that is true. Why? The reason is that awakening of the conscious being/ soul requires raised consciousness. We can’t do that by our own efforts, but we can prevent a lowering of consciousness.

If we do something wrong, a…[Read more]

“Introducing the concept of quantum entanglement does not explain anything about your God or the “human soul”.

“.…we can still keep the Cloud of Probability but use the simple wave function to express the “probability” of where the entangled particle is located. You can still discover more information about a…[Read more]

“Using Science / scientific argument to disprove God”

In claiming there is no evidence for God, atheists like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris use scientific argument.

Based on Evidence! The growing consensus amongst physicists is that the Universe is a simulation, a hologram. How come, if there is no…[Read more]

The Qu’ran is not a direct handed down text from Mohammad. Mohammad never wrote anything as…[Read more]

God’s plan is to sort out the good from the bad.

Those that are good get awakened more and more until they attain eternal life.

Those that are bad lose more consciousness until they end up in oblivion.

People can only…[Read more]

“I think Christianity comes out of it better than Islam“.

Even if you take every that is attributed to be the fault of Muslims, of which some isn’t (e.g., 911) the Muslims still look lily white compared to the Christians.

There are (just to name those that…[Read more]

Seeing God as personal or impersonal, is only a matter of how a particular person is able to or chooses to worship. If seeing God as personal (Jesus or Krishna etc.) enables them to develop love for the Divine, then it is a valid position…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote: Then how do you know it exists?

I will try to explain this, from my own experiences of enlightenment where there is a shift in identification.

“Normally” we hav…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
@Kyrani Eade. Welcome to the site. (Note I am a theist but of no particular religious persuasion)…. You seem convinced that Adam and Eve actually existed so you are either a Christian or a Muslim.

First, thank you for your welcome.

Adam and Eve may have existed or may be mythical. It is not relevant. It is only a s…

[Read more]

PopeBeanie wrote:

Kyrani Eade wrote:
There is no objective, scientific evidence for a subjective experience. But you know that you have subjective experiences. They are self-evident.

I agree with all of this, except that ‘scientific evidence’ (e.g. in the form of brain scans or other empirical measurements) is available, and will probably gro…

[Read more]

@KyraniEade – “there is no objective, scientific evidence for God.” “there is God. Both spiritual nature and God are self-evident.” – are you saying that a subjective experience is evidence of objective reality? A lot of people who have had spiritual awakenings say that they feel “everything is consciousness”, “everything is…[Read more]

Number 3 is important. There is no evidence for God. This is however not a premise that you can use to say 1 and 2.

There is no objective, scientific evidence for a subjective experience. But you know that you have subjective experiences. They are…[Read more]

God as “the force by which everything evolv…[Read more]