Activity

Its the same misquotes from real scientific paper’s.
The calculations are referring to the chance of Life occurring spontaneously.
This is a misunderstanding of the process of evolution.
The process of variation is random & spontaneous.
But the other more important process is cumulative non-random selection which had occurred over 3.5 billion years.
What he is referring to is Abiogenesis. How chemistry changed into biology. From simple chemical to self replicating molecules like RNA,DNA.
To be fair to Earl from what I’ve read this area of science is still quite new & researchers are still working things out. However this does not mean that evolution has been disproved.
In fact the very opposite, before life ( biological systems) the main theory of development is EVOLUTIONARY principles working on these primitive chemical building blocks of life in a process called Chemical Evolution.
chemical evolution” is used to describe the hypothesis that organic building blocks of life were created when inorganic molecules came together.
Whatever you believe as commented by Jakelafort. The probability of getting to replicator like RNA, DNA from basic chemicals. Is much more probable than probability of a being who is, (all-knowing), omnipotence (unlimited power), omnipresence (present everywhere). What’s the probability of that?
If I were asked to place a bet I’d know where I would be placing it on