Reg the Fronkey Farmer

In my case, this is more an exercise of learning how to explain a concept…..

Here is a fine technique to help. I use it while running on the dreadmill to see how much about a concept I know.

Yes, I read all of the post 🙂

You can have it all, my empire of dirt.

In the end the Pharaoh still dies. Even his greatest works fall to the great king, King Entropy and the sand eventually wins.

Ozymandias

I met a traveller from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless thi…[Read more]

@Simon, do you think that Buzzfeed did anything wrong because I think they are a bunch of lying shits.

Here is the response from Krauss.

Here is one I intended to put in Sunday School.

Why have I never seen that picture before!! Most excellent!!

The rain it raineth on the just

And also on the unjust fella: But chiefly on the just, because

The unjust steals the just’s umbrella.

Yes Tom I found that too:

Tom – I have previously debunked several claims made in other “evidence” you have linked regarding the EU hypothesis…

I have not claimed to have debunked the EU hypothesis, only much of what was offered in evidence to support it and only in the links provided. I will re-post it later and you can explain to me where I am wrong.

@ PopeBeanie, here is an article on conspiracy theory worth a read.

OK Tom but I remember almost everything I posted over the last 9 years and every debate and discussion I was engaged in. I have no recollection of using the word “debunk” in the context you stated. I have access to the old TA site and cannot find it. However it was mostly only on AZ that I pointed out where I found what you posted from…[Read more]

@Tom – please show me where I suggested that “debunk” required only my opinion and I will hold my hands up. I doubt if I would consider my subjective opinion as a valid reason to negate an hypothesis. I did not debunk EU, I just supplied arguments based upon what I know of Physics which appeared to undermine many of its arguments. You never…[Read more]

@Tom – Can you at least point out what post of mine needs debunking. I don’t want or expect any quarter given to anything I post. There are plenty of people here to debunk it and I can handle that without needing a safe space 🙂

Still waiting 🙂

A toast to GR so.

When Einstein was sailing across the Atlantic to the USA, he spent 3 days in conversation with Chaim Weizmann who later became the first President of Israel. Weizmann later went on to say that it was a rather one sided conversation as he just spoke about his new Theory but that at the end of the voyage he was convinced that…[Read more]

In fact the opposite is true. The FF members actively sponsor JWBL on an almost nightly basis. It is their favorite thing. I often drop in to get an argument started. “So guys do you agree that existence is not a predicate?” or “Why don’t we ever find fronkey fossils?” and leave them to it. I only drink once a year, a single Johnnie Walker Black …[Read more]

Tom – I have previously debunked several claims made in other “evidence” you have linked regarding the EU hypothesis (nothing to do with Brexit!!) and you replied to none of them. OK, maybe you missed them. Can you supply any peer reviewed papers? I can handle “reams of paper or an onscreen equivalent” without too much effort. Anything that…[Read more]