A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity.

Homepage › Forums › Atheism › A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity.

This topic contains 96 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by  Simon Paynton 2 weeks, 6 days ago.

Viewing 7 posts - 91 through 97 (of 97 total)
1 … 6 7
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 10, 2026 at 12:37 am #59587

    Reg the Fronkey Farmer
    Moderator

    For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

    January 10, 2026 at 12:49 am #59588

    TheEncogitationer
    Participant

    Jake,

    It is not the trying. It is an invalid hypothesis. When people assume the truth of the matter asserted and endeavor to prove their narcissistic biases that they come to by way of indoctrination it is ugly.

    I like Ike.

    Well put. And Iyk may be likeable, but not a good navigator. His thoughts and his AI doppelganger would more likely lead us to a Doomsday than a D-Day victory.

    Beware the Tech-Bro/Theological Complex!

    January 10, 2026 at 3:59 am #59589

    PopeBeanie
    Moderator
    TheEncogitationer wrote:

    If AI is to be a tool for the of human beings […]

    100%

    Simon Paynton wrote:

    You can’t knock him for trying.  But I think he’s misguided (by AI).

    I mentioned once about a roommate named Mark who counted up (via internet search results) the number of times “Mark” was mentioned in the bible. He had a few ideas about relevance of that, especially wrt his personal connection with scripture. I can’t imagine what he’s able to get AI to say about it these days, but I’m pretty sure he’s trying hard there, too. And he’s an odd character in many other ways.

    January 10, 2026 at 7:44 am #59593

    Simon Paynton
    Participant
    Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

    For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

    If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

    January 10, 2026 at 10:05 am #59594

    Reg the Fronkey Farmer
    Moderator

    For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

    January 10, 2026 at 5:50 pm #59595

    TheEncogitationer
    Participant

    Simon:

    If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

    Then it would be described by some kind of word incorporating “quad.”

    Look, let’s just rope off an empty space where Iyk can be King away from the rest of us, much as we should do with Orange Man Trump.

    January 10, 2026 at 9:59 pm #59597

    Simon Paynton
    Participant
    Simon Paynton wrote:

    For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

    Very good.  It reminds me of the way to tell the axes of a graph apart: x is across.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 91 through 97 (of 97 total)
1 … 6 7

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.