A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity.

[Reg the Fronkey Farmer]

For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

[TheEncogitationer]

Jake,

It is not the trying. It is an invalid hypothesis. When people assume the truth of the matter asserted and endeavor to prove their narcissistic biases that they come to by way of indoctrination it is ugly.

I like Ike.

Well put. And Iyk may be likeable, but not a good navigator. His thoughts and his AI doppelganger would more likely lead us to a Doomsday than a D-Day victory.

Beware the Tech-Bro/Theological Complex!

[PopeBeanie]

TheEncogitationer wrote:

If AI is to be a tool for the of human beings […]

100%

Simon Paynton wrote:

You can’t knock him for trying.  But I think he’s misguided (by AI).

I mentioned once about a roommate named Mark who counted up (via internet search results) the number of times “Mark” was mentioned in the bible. He had a few ideas about relevance of that, especially wrt his personal connection with scripture. I can’t imagine what he’s able to get AI to say about it these days, but I’m pretty sure he’s trying hard there, too. And he’s an odd character in many other ways.

[Simon Paynton]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

[Reg the Fronkey Farmer]

For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

[TheEncogitationer]

Simon:

If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

Then it would be described by some kind of word incorporating “quad.”

Look, let’s just rope off an empty space where Iyk can be King away from the rest of us, much as we should do with Orange Man Trump.

[Simon Paynton]

Simon Paynton wrote:

For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

Very good.  It reminds me of the way to tell the axes of a graph apart: x is across.

[Author]

Posts