Canada is the new United States
This topic contains 29 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by
Unseen 3 months, 3 weeks ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 8, 2025 at 7:45 pm #58372
Perhaps not militarily, but in many markets it’s shouldering the tariff-prone United States out of the picture. But sometimes it’s not even tariffs, it’s our products not meeting their standards.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpny5JHRIN0&t=1285s
Now and then, there are Youtube links that don’t display their thumbnails here for me, anyway. Anybody got a fix for this?
Corn has long been a staple export. around 150,000 square miles of American farmland are devoted to corn production, and we’re losing the market, a lot of it to Canada.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by
Unseen.
August 9, 2025 at 5:31 am #583776 minutes
August 9, 2025 at 3:55 pm #58384Changed to a direct ink because it won’t display the thumbnail.
11 Countries Are Replacing US For Canada as Trade Partner! How Bad Is This?
-
This reply was modified 4 months ago by
Unseen.
August 9, 2025 at 6:39 pm #58390The worst thing that Trump did was to fire Erika McEntarfer as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The damage to the reputation of the trustworthiness of US economic data, used by financial forecast organizations around the world, is now undermined, thanks to the guy who insists he is 6’3’’ and weighs 215…….
August 9, 2025 at 8:09 pm #58391August 9, 2025 at 8:37 pm #58392The worst thing that Trump did was to fire Erika McEntarfer as commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The damage to the reputation of the trustworthiness of US economic data, used by financial forecast organizations around the world, is now undermined, thanks to the guy who insists he is 6’3’’ and weighs 215…….
I wonder if the same information can be assembled by a fully independent non-governmental entity drawing on the same or equally-reliable sources of information. Much of the sourcing, I the reporting agency used, is publicly available.
August 9, 2025 at 9:19 pm #58393Yes, there are numerous sources of good data and methods to do this. I used to be involved in economic forecasting for a university “thinktank” in a previous career. Individual States can offer labor rates from jobless claims and job openings from Linkedin etc. MasterCard and Bank of America track credit card spending. The varied sources allow for cross referencing the figures. But I think BLS is the gold standard so it is likely that wider error bands will have to be allowed for. This will make the markets less steady and policy decision makers will become more cautious.
Thinking about this as I write, it will be possible to get A.I. to write Python scripts to pull data from various sources to give accurate figures. It could be easily tested against the last 36 months of data from the BLS for accuracy. Eventually (as in a few months) it might be more informative. I will write one now as it Saturday night!!
August 10, 2025 at 1:48 am #58395@Reg
I’m sure I’m not alone in saying my eyes glazed over. What I did was ask ChatGPT this: Recently the President basically took over the agency that issues monthly job statistics, presumably so he can meddle with it and provide only favorable data with little regard to accuracy. So, I’m wondering if it’s possible to basically derive the same statistical conclusions using publicly available data.
The AI returned with this reply:
**********
It’s definitely possible to independently estimate job growth, unemployment, and related labor statistics from public data, but it takes some work and the results won’t be quite as precise or timely as the official Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports—especially if the government stops publishing them transparently.
Here’s the big picture:
We can think of the BLS jobs reports as being based on two main surveys:Establishment Survey (CES) – surveys ~122,000 businesses and agencies about employment, hours, and earnings.
Household Survey (CPS) – surveys ~60,000 households about employment status, unemployment, etc.
If those numbers are withheld or tampered with, here’s how to replicate the core trends from alternative sources:1. Payroll / Establishment Data
Goal: Estimate monthly job gains/losses in specific sectors.
Sources you can use:ADP National Employment Report – private payroll processor, monthly job growth estimates.
Homebase, UKG, and Paychex/IHS Markit – small- and medium-business payroll activity data, often published weekly.
Indeed Hiring Lab & Glassdoor – job posting trends, hiring slowdown/acceleration signals.
Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) – aggregates multiple public/private indicators.2. Household Labor Status
Goal: Estimate unemployment rate, labor force participation.
Sources you can use:Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey microdata – still public if Census keeps publishing it, can calculate unemployment yourself.
Real-time population estimates from Census + private polling data from Gallup, Morning Consult, YouGov, etc., that ask about current employment status.
Household Pulse Survey (Census) – not as detailed, but can capture big shifts in employment.3. High-Frequency Indicators
These give early signs before the monthly jobs report:Initial Unemployment Claims – weekly, from the Department of Labor (difficult to fake because states submit it individually).
Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) – if compromised, private equivalents exist via LinkedIn or Indeed.
Transportation metrics – freight shipments, fuel consumption (proxy for industrial activity).
Small business optimism surveys – NFIB, regional Fed surveys.4. How to Put It Together
Blend multiple indicators in a statistical model (e.g., regression or nowcasting approach) to estimate job gains/losses.
Compare to historical correlations – for example, ADP payroll growth has a fairly stable relationship with CES growth over time, though not perfect month to month.
Track revisions – often the trend matters more than the initial number.Limitations
Private datasets don’t perfectly match the BLS methodology, so monthly noise will be higher.
Sectoral breakdowns (e.g., “manufacturing jobs” or “government jobs”) will be harder to replicate without the official survey.
Seasonal adjustment—something the BLS does meticulously—requires a good historical dataset and care to avoid misleading spikes/drops.If you want, I can map out a step-by-step “shadow BLS” method that uses freely available data sources and some simple statistical modeling so you could track the labor market even if official releases become unreliable. That would give you a jobs estimate within a reasonable margin of error.
Do you want me to go ahead and outline that full method?
**********
If you want it to do that, just go ahead and reproduce my query.
August 10, 2025 at 10:40 am #58398🙂 Sorry, I only intended to paste as far as “Author: (you)”, not the entire code….
August 11, 2025 at 7:18 pm #58426August 11, 2025 at 7:19 pm #58427I think the main reason Canada is supplanting the good ole USA is that they are friendly with their customers whereas Trump America is hostile.
August 11, 2025 at 8:16 pm #58429I think the biggest issue for most countries is that Trump cannot be trusted. The rest of the world has watched in bafflement and dismay at how Trump has treated Canada. In his first term he overhauled the NAFTA trade agreement, which became USMCA. I will admit that was a better trade agreement and one built on a broadly stable and modernized framework. USMCA continues to protect the bulk of trade and keeps the door open for further negotiation. At least it could have. Tough negotiation is part of the cost of doing business. But insulting Canadians, calling them the 51st State and having to watch Noem step dancing over and back at the Derby Line only closed that door further. Carney has now said that “We’ll speak when it makes sense” is where its at. So they will wait until Trump makes sense.
There is a renewed sense of Canadian pride and the world is very happy to do deals with Canada. I think most people are going to wait until there is a change of government in the USA before it will be trusted again. I am very “Pro-American” in my outlook and I am also concerned about the wrecking balls taken to Science and Academia, Healthcare and Education. I wonder if America will be able to recover as a world power that will be respected. That is what the civilized world hopes for. And behind all of this, in the background, are the religious zealots and power grabbing bigots that nobody seems to be talking about. They are like woodworms in a library. By the time anyone reacts to them all the books will be damaged. Then they will bring in a pedestal and put one book on it.
August 11, 2025 at 8:20 pm #58430The Canadians will happily and safely dance with their friends.
August 11, 2025 at 8:58 pm #58432@Reg
That as well, though I think what I proposed pretty much covers the same ground in different words. It’s not friendly to be constantly breaking rules and/or rewriting them unilaterally to one’s own advantage.
August 12, 2025 at 5:08 pm #58437I’m starting to think that destruction of the economy is actually an unstated part of the Project 2025 planners. They clearly want to establish something resembling a feudalism with an all powerful lord at the top, lords bound to him by fealty, and helpless compliant commoners with little control over anything beyond their own househods. Letting prices rise helps secure their helplessness.
Look at coffee. Trump has slapped a 50% tariff on Brazil and one of that country’s leading exports is coffee. They are the top producer and while their coffee is not the best, it is the basis for most coffee blends, including my daily favorite, Tim Horton’s, which is a Canadian brand comparable to Dunkin Donuts. Between Trump’s troubles with both Brazil and Canada, I wonder how much longer I’ll be able to drink it.
-
This topic was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.