Is the Temple Mount really the site of Antonio’s fortress thus ending conflict?
This topic contains 10 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by 
Belle Rose 3 years, 2 months ago.
-
Nay sayers have always pointed to the Western Wall in Jerusalem as evidence that the prophesy “ not one stone shall remain upon another” has not been fulfilled and thus the book can’t be true. And frankly this was a strong point. But now there is strong evidence that the Temple was located 600 ft away down hill from what is now identified as Antonio’s fortress thus conforming to the account of Flavius Josephus, long scorned as exaggerating in his account. Recently the city of David has been unearthed, now posited as the site of the Temple and indeed the Temple has been razed below its very foundation. But now the prophecy of the actual Jerusalem shaking off its dust is happening before our eyes.</p>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mXyO2m3uj8&feature=share
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pi24N7Y_Zzk&feature=share
This means that reconstruction can commence without war between Israel and its neighbors.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by
michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:Who is Antonio when he is at home? Not the Merchant of Venice??
LOL, Anionio’d fortress was situated 600 feet from the temple uphill so that the Roman Legión housed there can observe the actual Temple Mount for disturbances. It was connected by a colonnade for rapid deployment, According to Josephus a battle was waged there as Titus the commander observed. He later became Emperor appointing Josephus as the Empire’s historian. Antonio’s fortress was a city bigger than the city of David. It was like a palace complete with market places and brothels for the 6000 strong Legion. The wall of the fortress was slightly trapezoidal but sat on an area comparable to other Roman fortresses housing a Legion.Proof positive is that the pool of Siloam and the Gihon spring have been located in the city of David, the water source of the Temple, which once gushed 450 ft in Temple times and fed the Pool of Siloam where the priest were purified.
@Reg
I’m not doing anything to dispel the rumor that engineers can’t spell or have poor diction and grammar. Yes. It’s Antonia fortress. If the Jews tore down the dome of the Rock and built it at the misidentified site, it would the prelude to war.
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by michael17.
-
This topic was modified 3 years, 2 months ago by
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.