michael17

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

How many software engineers does it take to change a light-bulb ??

It depends on how you stack or com-pile their IBM cards.

@Reg

I’m not doing anything to dispel the rumor that engineers can’t spell or have poor diction and grammar. Yes. It’s Antonia fortress. If the Jews tore down the dome of the Rock and built it at the misidentified site, it would the prelude to war.

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:Who is Antonio when he is at home? Not the Merchant of Venice??

LOL, Anionio’d fortress was situated 600 feet from the temple uphill so that the Roman Legión housed there can observe the actual  Temple Mount for disturbances. It was connected by a colonnade for rapid deployment, According  to Josephus a battle was…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

Michael, Snopes rated your giant coverup conspiracy “Satire.” Why are you bringing it up as supporting your case?

I already said that the Smithsonian allegation was false but their actions give us no reason not to believe the story in    a previous post.

Unseen wrote:

Michael, giants are very unhealthy people with a lot of difficulties in life. They don’t live very long and, The Bible to the contrary, wouldn’t make very good warriors. Educate yourself. Why don’t we grow to be 10 feet tall? How tall can a human grow?

There were well proportioned mighty giants in the past. Watch the first video…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

The veracity of the theory of evolution has no dependency on biogenesis. This story is false. “What you see over there aren’t giants, but windmills“, said Sancho.

For certain, but it questions whether we can remove the source of life or a creator out of the picture. What blows life into inanimate star stuff?

Unseen wrote:

Well, michael17, it’s just your bad luck that the theory of evolution is pretty well proven, giants or no giants.

Not all of the tenets of evolution are untrue. Just remember that until science can account for biogenesis all cards are still on the table.  But in regard to hominid evolution, it is certainly    an unproven narr…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

Not buying that story about evolution, eh Michael?

I’m partial to this mans stance:

https://youtu.be/iGuIgEpH5U4

Actually despite purchasing thousands of giant skeletons and “loosing” them the never admitted to doing it deliberately and their motive is unknown. However the Smithsonian dogged pro evolution stance gives little reason to deny the false report. Certainly the evidence of 8 -30 foot humans does not necessarily prove the existence of the nep…

[Read more]

The Smithsonian has admitted to covering up evidence of giants purportedly to preserve the narrative of evolution.

https://youtu.be/sVmOnwng6gs

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

The scarecrow in my field in tied to a planck. That allows him certain degrees of freedom to appear in a different part of the field every time I look over at him. I think he likes the indeterminacy it affords him because when he looks at the world through his rose-tinted quantum shades he finds the future is not…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

https://physicsworld.com/a/new-particle-links-dark-matter-with-missing-antimatter/

Contrary to your assertion that “anti particles have been posited for dark matter, however tests have ruled it out.” your link speculates about a new particle. I don’t see that anti-particles have been ruled out conclusively. There…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

universe…

without some form of intervention, the universe is a conundrum. Moreover empty space is missing virtual particles by wild orders of magnitude

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

anti particles have been posited for dark matter, however tests have ruled it out.

What “tests,” Michael?

Here is a test in the past:

https://physicsworld.com/a/new-particle-links-dark-matter-with-missing-antimatter/

<li class=”d4p-bbp-quote-title”>Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

@ Michael17 – You are not acquainted with recent scientific jargon. It has been used in reference to dark matter….(to Unseen). I am speaking of agencies that predate the universe……(to me). It is possible that Dark Energy is actually the cosmological constant – that Einstein…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

I guess that I was not clear. I am speaking of agencies that predate the universe…. OK, I had not realized you meant “non-baryonic” in the Biblical sense. How did Ezekiel detect them? Where did he get the technology? Did he deduce from his vision of the “throne chariot” that it was not constructed with any protons?…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

I extrapolate from the prophets. I see their predictions coming true for the last 2600 years. But to answer your question, the event that I described is contemporary with the reconstruction of the Jewish Temple being completed. Currently the keystone of the former temple has been found for reuse,The vestal garments…

[Read more]

Davis wrote:

I assure you that there are now agencies operating in the sky that will make this possible along with the false miracles to deceive man.

I generally tend to be extremely skeptical of people who assure me that operatives are carrying out anything happening in the sky.

Mark my words.

And what kind of time frame are we talking about?…

[Read more]

Unseen wrote:

michael17 wrote:

The word is non-baryonic thus not subject to the universal laws of physics.

Now you’re talking grammatical nonsense. If “baryonic” is a bit of physics jargon, it follows that so is its negative form just as non-centripetal would be a bit of physics jargon. Also, the dictionary. Correction: no dictionary I could…

[Read more]