michael17

michael17 wrote:

Simon Paynton wrote:

michael17 wrote:

happenstance can design and control a system But an organism has to be adapted to its environment, or it can’t do well, and will be selected against by natural selection. Those cells that are best at surviving and reproducing in an environment will become the dominant paradigm. Reproduction o…

[Read more]

@Simon Paynton.

An accelerated simulation  showing that happenstance can design and control a system can be offered as evidence. There is no such simulation to date. However the partial simulation  of known cells structures has been attempted.  Google these simulations you might mine some progress.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8G9AjMK/ <u>Scientist are already in a quandary as to the origen of the first DNA molecule since it is impossible to occur naturally. Now you have complex nano machines with strategically placed scaffolding operating in all cells.</u>

<u>I suppose your explanation is the more plausible one…

[Read more]

The synthesis of DNA building blocks from RNA precursors is a major argument in favor of RNA preceding DNA in evolution…. Yes, that is why scientists are not “already in a quandary”. The science around it, while not settled, is rather compelling. I also agree that evolution is more of a tinkerer that an engin…

[Read more]

_Robert_ wrote:

michael17 wrote:

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

Scientist are already in a quandary as to the origin of the first DNA molecule since it is impossible to occur naturally…. This is completely untrue.

The synthesis of DNA building blocks from RNA precursors is a major argument in favor of RNA preceding DNA in evolution. The direct p…

[Read more]

Highly unlikely transforms into highly probable when conditions are duplicated countless times. Or angels did .

Countless times? Complex nano technology?, Good luck with that.

Scientist are already in a quandary as to the origin of the first DNA molecule since it is impossible to occur naturally…. This is completely untrue.

The synthesis of DNA building blocks from RNA precursors is a major argument in favor of RNA preceding DNA in evolution. The direct prebiotic origin of is t…[Read more]

_Robert_ wrote:

Any aliens worth their salt will shape-shift into blue-eyed, blonde jesus clones in white robes just before they roast our moronic civilization.

You probably are not far from the great deception at the end of this age. All orchestrated by the powers of darkness living in sinful man.

TheEncogitationer wrote:

Michael17, Another consideration: If there are Objects, and they are Unidentified and Flying, then yes, there are Unidentified Flying Objects. Unidentified is the operative term here. That means they are not necessarily extraterrestrial nor Lizard People nor inhabitants of The Hollow Earth. Assuming they are not frauds…

[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

Those aliens would probe anything. I have seen some of the abductees interviewed and can only conclude that the aliens took a lot of mushrooms first. I mean given that they have traveled millions of light years to get here and with billions of people on the planet to choose from, the aliens choice was to probe them?…

[Read more]

THE POWER OF INDOCTRINATION EXHIBIT A michael 17 An otherwise intelligent guy whose brain has been transformed into mush. Very little hope for humanity…unless…unless…the Messiah E.T. gonna come to our rescue.

A mindless universe created your finely engineered mind and body with the power of a god

jakelafort wrote:

Michael i am assuming you are nearly certain it is angels who are intervening? I don’t have an explanation but i am A-angel as an explanation of anything. I mean come on. Why all of this BS if there is a god who cares about humans? Just make an appearance and clear things with all humans. If there is an architect it ought to b…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

And at the risk of failing to convey an obvious point-it is great for cults to insist on belief and failing that all manner of suffering and calamity will result but it strains credulity in anyone rational to imagine creator of the universe who has a hissy fit over that. If it were important to a creator then the creator is a…

[Read more]

Thankful am I the creator populated earth with humans and cockroaches in an incomprehensible universe after millions of years of evolution and furnished a guidebook with clear mandates so that no dissension, discrimination or hatred would ensue. Otherwise we would have sectarian violence, internecine warfare, slavery, terrorism,…

[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:

Primogeniture and ever changing alliances caused an admixture so that it is arbitrary and self-serving to conclude as you have that 3 bloodlines remain. Michael have you considered that you are the shining star of confirmation bias?

See the  response to Davis.

Davis wrote:

No. If you are talking about a common ancestor…every single King and Queen have one single ancestor. So…by your very strange and completely arbitrary definition…there is only one house.

These houses are defined in any appropriate source of your choice. It will even give the coat of arms.…[Read more]

Davis wrote:

Current royal houses in Europe:

• United Kingdom
• Sweden
• Denmark
• Norway
• Netherlands
• Belgium
• Luxembourg
• Spain

(Russia is not included)

These are not royal houses. The House refers to a  royal bloodline, and now there are three bloodlines from which all the royal families in power today come from Oldenburg, Nassau and…[Read more]