Abortion is the murder of innocent children
Homepage › Forums › Small Talk › Abortion is the murder of innocent children
This topic contains 34 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Unseen 1 year, 3 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 27, 2023 at 10:09 pm #48441
Unless the mother says otherwise. But no public health care for it, except maybe in Florida. And (by the way), BLAME GOD for it.
And name it Terry, as in Shiavo. I’m feeling like being really dark today.
May 28, 2023 at 3:05 am #48444Probably the #1 thing we could do to reduce the human footprint is to drastically reduce the number of humans down to somewhere what it was when those Siberians walked across the ice bridge into North America.
Blaming meat eating on Christianity is overthinking it. People were eating mammals, birds, and fish long before Abraham. Even in cultures that didn’t teach that some deity gave edible critters as a gift to humankind but instead bestowed spirithood on everything from mountains and rivers to bears and deer and fish, they ate animal protein.
We still like animal protein be it cattle, fish, or bat on a stick.
I have long held that “solutions” to philosophical problems (free will, for example) that only specialist philosophers with MA’s and PhD’s can understand aren’t solutions at all. Likewise, solutions that aren’t going to happen are not real solutions. They are wishful thinking. If you want to solve a problem start with setting what will work (can be done) apart from what won’t work (can’t be done). Otherwise, you’re wasting precious time.
Ultimately, the solution to this problem will have to be technological not socially engineered, unless some environmentally-oriented benevolent dictator comes along with storm troopers to force us to change our love for steak, ribs, chicken, and salmon.
May 28, 2023 at 3:43 pm #48450Unseen i despise Christianity. I am not however so delusional that i blame it for us eating meat.
I was making an observation about how narrow and self-absorbed we are in both the macrocosm and microcosm. The early christians had the geocentric perspective. The earth was the center of the universe. Not until Copernicus published his work published posthumously in 1543 was that narcissism challenged. (Although who really knows whether others challenged it)
So it is on an individual basis in terms of how we ascribe value and love to certain animals. Concomitantly we rip into our steak while there is nothing to distinguish the value of the ill-treated and ultimately slaughtered as meat for our table from the beloved kitten. Likewise silly narratives and ideology make us look askance at the dirty immigrants and the litany of OTHERS.
May 28, 2023 at 8:22 pm #48455So it is on an individual basis in terms of how we ascribe value and love to certain animals. Concomitantly we rip into our steak while there is nothing to distinguish the value of the ill-treated and ultimately slaughtered as meat for our table from the beloved kitten. Likewise silly narratives and ideology make us look askance at the dirty immigrants and the litany of OTHERS.
Love is not rational. Should it be? Should it be distributed equally? Should I love the hog from which my pork chop came as fully as I love my pet cat? my daughter?
Rational love. Nonsense. Inhuman. Contrary to human nature.
May 28, 2023 at 9:45 pm #48457Unseen, you are missing my point.
No quibble about love of cats. No gainsaying the love/friendship/attachment/bond so many of us form with cats and dogs-for some weirdos, snakes and reptiles. Feeling for one rather than another is human although it is mostly a matter of keeping an animal. If you have one you are likely to develop those loving feelings.
It is narcissistic, selfish and cruel to determine the life and fate of an animal based on an idiosyncratic viewpoint and then condemn it to a life of suffering and slaughter. Just like the early Christians who thought they were at the center of the universe and not coincidentally that animals were for us to exploit we posit our IMPORTANCE and assign value to other animals based on their perceived value to us. Slaves did not count either. It was about usefulness to us. If they are good companions we will mostly take great care and love them. If they are a historical source of food we will raise them en masse in horrifying conditions to be slaughtered. We observe the depth of of cats and dogs with their hipness to our emotions and ways we communicate and so we relate to them with as much empathy as our loved ones.
If aliens visit us and we are powerless to thwart their conquest of humanity we can only hope they are more advanced and less narcissistic and selfish. Lets suppose we are to them what an ant is to us. Will they decide red-heads and great big fat people have value and will be allowed to thrive while enslaving and torturing the rest? Will we as individuals enter the equation or only our usefulness to the aliens?
May 29, 2023 at 12:01 am #48458An idiosyncrasy is a “peculiarity or oddity of behavior or attitude.” What makes liking meat or treating some creatures differently from others “idiosyncratic” when it is so universal? As for the horrific conditions, our own lives involve horror, especially here in America where I very likely may die a horrible death because I simply can’t afford the life saving medical treatment.
Don’t lecture me about our cruelty to animals or horrific conditions as long as you maintain your love of horse racing.
I was 18 when I first saw a racehorse break down. It was the late 1990s and I was an exercise rider galloping horses at Del Mar racetrack, the Pacific Ocean glistening in the distance. Seared into my memory is the image of a petite dark bay horse on the inside rail just by the wire in the bleached light of a southern California morning. The rider, who had escaped injury, stood tugging at the reins fighting to keep the horse still. The horse had suffered a clean break of the right front ankle and his foot dangled and swung from the bottom of his leg. He turned and staggered on the stump in panic – euthanasia would soon follow. I averted my eyes and felt instantly sick as I jogged my filly by, the siren that blares across the backside when there is an accident ringing through my head. At that time I could not have known it would be the first of many such scenes I would see over the years of my life on the track.
Decades later the deaths roll on. Seven racehorses lost their lives in the days leading up to this year’s Kentucky Derby. Four breakdowns, a broken neck in the paddock, and two yet-to-be-explained collapses paint a grim picture of horse racing in America. (Another weekend of death at the Kentucky Derby but don’t expect change)
At least eating is a necessary function. Betting on horses running far faster than is safe is not. And the corrupt sport of horse racing does far worse sometimes than simply pushing the animals too hard.
May 29, 2023 at 2:04 am #48461Unseen, You’ve missed the idioscyncracy i was pointing out: That another sentient life on a par with the beloved and doted animal is condemned to a lifetime of misery before it is executed. We grow up to view cute cute kittahns with those big adoring eyes as objects of love. The oink oink pig, great big fat pink F’r, who is perhaps more intelligent or the livestock that we never see in that adoring way unless we live on a farm or are peculiarly thoughtful and generous of spirit is generation after generation in its own holocaust to be processed and treated without a morsel of dignity.
Comparing conditions betweens Americans who are uninsured with animals as aforementioned is ridiculous. That said I am all for universal medical. I think it is obscene that US lacks it.
I was not lecturing YOU. I was addressing US.
I am not fond of pointing out fallacies. Yet i think it is obvious which one you’ve committed in discussing horse racing and my love of it as a retort. Horse racing definitely has aspects of cruelty. And again we have utilized artificial selection to further our selfish interests without regard to welfare of animals. Most racing thoroughbreds, however, are treated like gold. They are expensive investments to purchase and maintain. I think the stable hands often have it tougher than the horses. I would be fine with racing appaloosas, paints and arabians. Those breeds are much less frail and subject to injury or fatal breakdowns.
May 29, 2023 at 2:54 am #48462Most racing thoroughbreds, however, are treated like gold. They are expensive investments to purchase and maintain. I think the stable hands often have it tougher than the horses. I would be fine with racing appaloosas, paints and arabians. Those breeds are much less frail and subject to injury or fatal breakdowns.
We all have our blind spots, Jake. A horse would be much happier in a pasture than with a midget whipping its ass as it’s forced right up to the very limit of what its very physical structure allows. And, sadly, sometimes beyond.
So, why is there horse racing. Who needs it? Certainly not the animals.
We can’t worry about everything we could worry about or our lives would become shit. Products made in China are probably made under working conditions and duress (bordering on slavery) that we would find unacceptable. And yet, we all enjoy our cell phones without thinking about what goes on at Foxconn. In fact, any product sourced from Asia likely is made with either workers working under dreadful oppression or actual slavery.
I’ve been saying if you want to solve a problem it’s folly to concentrate on things that won’t change, and if something won’t change, it’s irrational to worry about it or feel guilt over it.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by Unseen.
May 29, 2023 at 3:50 am #48464Unseen,
“We all have our blind spots, Jake. A horse would be much happier in a pasture than with a midget whipping its ass as it’s forced right up to the very limit of what its very physical structure allows. And, sadly, sometimes beyond.”
I should not have laughed at midget whipping its ass but hell i am human. In the case of thoroughbreds that assertion may be inaccurate. Highstrung and born to run i am not sure that is true. Other breeds i can accept that. Juicer trainers in USA have discovered chemical cocktails that enhance performance and drugs that have thoroughbreds continue to give their all when pain signals are circumvented and do indeed result in catastrophic injuries. Capitalism being the mother of all drivers, other trainers and owners needed to stay competitive and more and more followed suit. Probably similar dynamic to bodybuilders and baseball players..
Currently in USA there is new federal legislation that created an agency known as HISA that promotes uniform rules in all US states and has various mandates to prohibit illegal drugs and to detect same from post race samples. Hopefully they can help clean up the mess.
Why is there horse racing? Reasonable question. American natives had horse races. Europeans and colonial Muricans had horse racing in the 17th century. It is an incredibly exciting sport and spectacle. Add in the lure of gambling and the intellectual puzzle that each race presents and it is a dopamine smorgasbord. Operant conditioning is at work with all forms of gambling. Horse racing is no exception. And the sights and smells of the race track are indescribably delicious. As an industry horse racing employs 1.7 million according to a quick search. End it and lots of people looking for jobs. My life as an attorney sucked donkey balls. Being a professional gambler has given me opportunity to pursue fitness and be outside a great deal. You might think it is boring but it is not. Handicapping horse races is so damn engrossing. I get lost hour after hour in the analysis of data.
I essentially am aligned with your sentiments in the last two paragraphs.
May 29, 2023 at 5:13 pm #48467Let’s bring this to an end. To my mind, gambling is the only reason there’s a horse racing industry and the presence of a profit motive is the main driver behind the race horse deaths. Take the money out of it, and the motivation to overdrive the animals will be greatly reduced.
However, like eating meat, horse racing is one of those things that isn’t going to change, though legislation like the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act of 2020 can make it better, even though its positive effect on this year’s Derby seems to have been negligible. If not, then perhaps many horses were saved, a shocking but sad possibility.
Tackling dog fighting, another sport in which animals of the same species are pitted against each other, is far easier because that’s not generally a “sport” favored by powerful and connected people and, well, it’s simply not very glamorous is it?
May 29, 2023 at 7:00 pm #48469Unseen, i agree that the INDUSTRY would end. However horse racing would continue on a limited basis. There is a long history of humans being attracted to races. Whether it is other humans, dogs or horses. If the gambling were made illegal then it would occur privately.
I am not sure horse racing will last. PETA was the impetus behind killing dog racing in USA. They are trying to do same thing with horses. HISA that i mentioned already either recently was or soon will be implemented. I am not going to look it up cuz am in between races. Fatal breakdowns occur randomly and that means at times there is an unnatural increase in the numbers. That statistic or pace will not continue with or without implementation of HISA.
Eating meat would be the easies one to eliminate but i don’t see it happening. We already have some tasty plant based meats and new ones are on way. And the lab grown meat could replace the animals permanently. That is an endeavor in its infancy but very promising.
May 30, 2023 at 5:30 pm #48473Unseen, i agree that the INDUSTRY would end. However horse racing would continue on a limited basis. There is a long history of humans being attracted to races. Whether it is other humans, dogs or horses.
Not only races competitions to be wagered on with all kinds of stakes from money (of course) to if your (whatever) beats mine, I’ll (reward offered…bottle of scotch, steak dinner, whatever). So, dogfighting and cockfighting need to be rolled into the same category.
If the gambling were made illegal then it would occur privately. I am not sure horse racing will last. PETA was the impetus behind killing dog racing in USA. They are trying to do same thing with horses. HISA that i mentioned already either recently was or soon will be implemented. I am not going to look it up cuz am in between races. Fatal breakdowns occur randomly and that means at times there is an unnatural increase in the numbers. That statistic or pace will not continue with or without implementation of HISA.
Come on. They cluster around competitions where horses are overdriven so that people can make money on the competitions and speculate on race horse genetics. Are you totally blind to that fact?
Eating meat would be the easies one to eliminate but i don’t see it happening. We already have some tasty plant based meats and new ones are on way. And the lab grown meat could replace the animals permanently. That is an endeavor in its infancy but very promising.
Oh, I think horse racing (the industry) would be fairly easy to eliminate and I think that its on its way to happening.
Proponents of “lab grown” meat must not be meat lovers. It’s hard to imagine a bone-in pork chop, ribs (pork or beef), chicken wings, or porterhouse steak coming out of a “lab.” No one will be interested in celebrating their anniversary at the local fake steak restaurant.
The problem of green house gases related to meat farming needs a technological solution that eliminates or neutralizes the gas, not one that generates a weird substance resembling meat.
It’s hard to anticipate what that solution might be but it may have a lot to do with what we feed the animals. If we’re not working on such a solution in a “light speed” fashion the way we came up with a Covid vaccine, there’s little time to lose.
Of course, one approach is to work on things that are more amenable than convincing people not to like meat. The cement used in construction accounts for 7% of greenhouse gas emissions. In fact, agriculture in total, including rearing livestock, is only about 10%. There are several more amenable areas to be working on which could impact consumers far less than upending their dietary preferences, which are cultural. How and what people eat, their cuisine, is cultural just like their music and their literature.
Big changes meet big resistance. Changing the national diet is a big change affecting most people. Giving up horse racing would affect very very few.
May 31, 2023 at 4:56 am #48476Unseen, i thought we were putting this to bed. But okay.
“Come on. They cluster around competitions where horses are overdriven so that people can make money on the competitions and speculate on race horse genetics. Are you totally blind to that fact?”
Races are year round in USA. How is the period before KY derby different from any other period? There is always an incentive to win. You’d have to show statistically that catastrophic injuries/fatalaties have occurred historically at a greater rate around triple crown and breeders cup races. I am not buying it. So my analogy is to flipping coins or treatment of cancer. Lets supoose a quarter is flipped 10k times. Every sequence of say 100 flips will not be in range of 48 one way to 52 other. There will be runs of 22 tails to 78 heads or some such deviation is inevitable. And lets suppose some hospital is best in land in treating stage 4 colon cancer. Their five yr survival rate surpasses all others. Still there will be periods when the mortality rate is unusually high. So it is in horse racing. There have been other periods where this has happened most notably in California in recent years.
“Oh, I think horse racing (the industry) would be fairly easy to eliminate and I think that its on its way to happening.”
“Proponents of “lab grown” meat must not be meat lovers. It’s hard to imagine a bone-in pork chop, ribs (pork or beef), chicken wings, or porterhouse steak coming out of a “lab.” No one will be interested in celebrating their anniversary at the local fake steak restaurant.”
Not easy to eliminate. No. Long history. If it is anywhere near the quoted figure i adduced of 1.7 million in the horse racing industry that is substantial. And killing it would add a real burden to economy. Also unlike dogracing the horse racing industry has some muscle behind it. The KY Derby it is a big and iconic event that many millions of Americans get involved. At one point in our history horse racing was second to baseball in popularity.
I don’t know why it is hard to conceive of meat from a lab being meat. Use the cells to grown an animal or animal parts sans brain. No suffering. It is beautiful. Furthermore no hormones and the type and percentage of fat is controlled. So much healthier alternative. And in terms of winning over the public it could be done notwithstanding our love affair with meat and disconnect with animal suffering.
Humans are easily influenced. Issues which seemed so intractable to the multitudes can be and have been rewritten. For instance when i was a kid i thought our policy on marijuana was utterly stupid and i argued with peoplem educated idiots who were intransigent. Now in the USA the propaganda has died down and i smell dope all over the place and the public aint where it used to be on an easy issue.
Same can happen with lab grown meat. All you would have to do is get those horrifying images of shocking cruelty and miserable lives. Prove that the livestock are just like our beloved cats and dogs with their emotions, intelligence and social order. There is in essence a holocaust of nonhuman animals with big time feelings. We can remedy that right quick! Couple that with meat that tastes the same but is healthier and has additional benefit of adding land that is no longer needed for farming and ameliorating if only a little the climate issue and wullah. World opinion changed.
Here is an article about the current spate of tragic horse deaths.
https://www.wlky.com/article/churchill-downs-horse-deaths-investigation/44044173#
May 31, 2023 at 6:14 pm #48477“Come on. They cluster around competitions where horses are overdriven so that people can make money on the competitions and speculate on race horse genetics. Are you totally blind to that fact?”
Races are year round in USA. How is the period before KY derby different from any other period? There is always an incentive to win. You’d have to show statistically that catastrophic injuries/fatalaties have occurred historically at a greater rate around triple crown and breeders cup races.
Strawman. I’m not saying that injuries are somehow only related to the major events, I’m saying it’s endemic to thoroughbred horse racing in general I suppose I can exclude some of the other forms of horse racing like trotting.
“Oh, I think horse racing (the industry) would be fairly easy to eliminate and I think that its on its way to happening.”
(Ending horse racing) would add a real burden to economy. Also unlike dogracing the horse racing industry has some muscle behind it. The KY Derby it is a big and iconic event that many millions of Americans get involved. At one point in our history horse racing was second to baseball in popularity.
I love the analogy, since baseball itself is dying. Horse racing is already dying. I’m 76 and I can remember a lot more interest in it when I was young. Today, it’s barely mentioned in the news except the horse deaths and other race-related scandals.
Horses are about as relevant to most people nowadays as pterodactyls. Fifty years ago, there were TV shows you could watch that featured horses: “Mr. Ed” and “My Friend Flicka,” westerns like “Bonanza,” and “Have Gun Will Travel.” Horse-related events are now upper-crusty events for the most part and the races have to compete with golf, soccer, and what’s left of baseball for the average Joe’s attention
On the other hand, there is far more public sympathy for horses than for cattle, swine, and chickens, which are considered foodstuffs.
I don’t know why it is hard to conceive of meat from a lab being meat. Use the cells to grown an animal or animal parts sans brain. No suffering. It is beautiful. Furthermore no hormones and the type and percentage of fat is controlled. So much healthier alternative. And in terms of winning over the public it could be done notwithstanding our love affair with meat and disconnect with animal suffering.
I’m not saying it wouldn’t be meat, but many of the best kinds of meat come on bones, chicken with skin, too (which many think is the most delicious part). And eliminating real meat and poultry would inevitably drive us toward ocean fish, which are already being overfished in order to satisfy people who want a more “healthy” diet.
Growing more food plants will decrease wild habitat, kill fragile ecosystems, and throw more species into becoming endangered. Some will have to go extinct, sacrificed on the altar of eating more veggies.
More vegetable agriculture inevitably also means using more fertilizer. Let’s talk about the environmental effects of fertilizer:
Fertilizers used on land almost inevitably end up in rivers, lakes, and the ocean. The alternative is to grow in giant greenhouses and chemically clean up the water after use. Greenhouse construction and use present us with their own environmental issues many of them having to do with greenhouse gases.
Repeated use of synthetic fertilizers can lead to the degradation of soil quality and nutrient imbalances making the land unarable for long periods, requiring converting even more land to plant agriculture.
The production and use of nitrogen-based fertilizers contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Manufacturing synthetic fertilizers requires energy, often derived from fossil fuels, leading to carbon dioxide emissions. Moreover, nitrogen-based fertilizers can undergo processes like nitrification and denitrification, which release nitrous oxide—a potent greenhouse gas that itself contributes to climate change.
Humans are easily influenced. Issues which seemed so intractable to the multitudes can be and have been rewritten. For instance when i was a kid i thought our policy on marijuana was utterly stupid and i argued with peoplem educated idiots who were intransigent. Now in the USA the propaganda has died down and i smell dope all over the place and the public aint where it used to be on an easy issue.
People tried marijuana and liked it. I’ll wager that people will be far less enthusiastic about lab “meat” that doesn’t closely replicate what people are used to throwing on the grill.
Same can happen with lab grown meat. All you would have to do is get those horrifying images of shocking cruelty and miserable lives. Prove that the livestock are just like our beloved cats and dogs with their emotions, intelligence and social order. There is in essence a holocaust of nonhuman animals with big time feelings. We can remedy that right quick! Couple that with meat that tastes the same but is healthier and has additional benefit of adding land that is no longer needed for farming and ameliorating if only a little the climate issue and wullah. World opinion changed.
Where did you get this idea that we are unaware of and never think about slaughterhouses? And that if only we did, we’d start hankering for lab meat?
Here is an article about the current spate of tragic horse deaths.
https://www.wlky.com/article/churchill-downs-horse-deaths-investigation/44044173#
Here is my favorite quote: “”Everyone is committed to figuring out what’s happening. Everyone is committed to stopping it to the extent it can be stopped,” said HISA CEO Lisa Lazarus.
“To the extent it can be stopped” is a tacit admission that overdriving horses will always cause unnecessary injuries to the horses.
I also like the array of investigators: Equine veterinarians for Churchill Downs, the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, and the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority… In other words, a bunch of insiders who think horse racing must be protected. It’s like the Secret Service investigating itself.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by Unseen.
May 31, 2023 at 8:21 pm #48484Unseen put the baby to bed. It is overtired.
Strawman? You are wrong. I was responding to your awkward language which is rendered meaningless unless i interpreted it as i did. “Come on. They cluster around competitions where horses are overdriven so that people can make money on the competitions and speculate on race horse genetics. Are you totally blind to that fact?”
And yes fatalities are part of horse racing. You have simply reiterated my point except that i elucidated by indicating that percentages in the long term are not always indicative of the short term.
There is no denying it has declined although handle has increased significantly since Covid. Also and i quote from NBC…”THE KENTUCKY DERBY ON NBC AND PEACOCK IS THE MOST WATCHED SPORTING EVENT SINCE SUPER BOWL, AVERAGING NEARLY 15 MILLION VIEWERS.” Thus rumors of its demise are exagerrated to steal a line. So far greater relevance than you believe..
No question there is far greater feeling and sympathy for horses than cattle, swine and chickens. That however is a narrative that can be changed. I could give many examples of how died in the wool beliefs shit the bed and were entirely transformed.
I assume lab grown meat will ultimately be indistinguishable from meat-bones, gristle marbling etc. Switching to lab meat would not eliminate meat. It would cause us to eat healthier meat. So i don’t see why we would grow more plants and if we had to there would be more farm land because there would be none devoted to livestock. Also eating more plants means less cancer and heart disease and less burden on our healthcare.
I don’t know nuttin bout fertilizer.
Yeah policing itself is always a joke.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.