King Iyk

Simon:

Someone said that the reason LLM validates @kingiyk‘s “proof” of God’s existence, is that the internet is full of information and discourse that agrees with it. Whereas, there’s not much on the true existence of Dracula. So, the LLM repeats what it sees.

There’s the whole article in last week’s Sunday School about how AI validates wha…

[Read more]

Someone said that the reason LLM validates @kingiyk‘s “proof” of God’s existence, is that the internet is full of information and discourse that agrees with it.  Whereas, there’s not much on the true existence of Dracula.  So, the LLM repeats what it sees.

There’s the whole article in last week’s Sunday School about how AI validates what people w…[Read more]

It may well be that @kingiyk‘s “proof” is logically consistent, i.e., logically valid.  When AI checks it, it validates it on the grounds of internal logical consistency.

But that’s not the same as being empirically valid – valid in the real world.  To be valid in the real world, all the premises have to be real (I don’t know – I assume) and t…[Read more]