Site-Wide Activity

Simon Paynton wrote:
For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

Very good.  It reminds me of the way to tell the axes of a graph apart: x is across.

Simon:

If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

Then it would be described by some kind of word incorporating “quad.”

Look, let’s just rope off an empty space where Iyk can be King away from the rest of us, much as we should do with Orange Man Trump.

For some the cross is a plus but it’s a negative for me.

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

If the trinity is going to represent the cross, then it needs to be a 4, not a 3.

TheEncogitationer wrote:
If AI is to be a tool for the of human beings […]

100%

Simon Paynton wrote:
You can’t knock him for trying.  But I think he’s misguided (by AI).

I mentioned once about a roommate named Mark who counted up (via internet search results) the number of times “Mark” was mentioned in the bible. He had a few ideas about rele…[Read more]

Jake,

It is not the trying. It is an invalid hypothesis. When people assume the truth of the matter asserted and endeavor to prove their narcissistic biases that they come to by way of indoctrination it is ugly.

I like Ike.

Well put. And Iyk may be likeable, but not a good navigator. His thoughts and his AI doppelganger would more likely…[Read more]

For most Christians the cross is a symbol of the resurrection, not the trinity.

Simon:

You can’t knock him for trying. But I think he’s misguided (by AI).

For trying a massive high-tech Gish Gallop Non Sequitur, yes, you can blame him.

And ackshuyally, he’s misguiding both himself and the AI and the AI is reinforcing his misguidance and trying to take us along for the ride. It’s case of the blind leading the blind, the…[Read more]

It is not the trying. It is an invalid hypothesis. When people assume the truth of the matter asserted and endeavor to prove their narcissistic biases that they come to by way of indoctrination it is ugly.

I like Ike.

TheEncogitationer wrote:
King Iyk has made it pretty clear how Christians can use AI to spout pseudo-mathematical apologetics.

You can’t knock him for trying.  But I think he’s misguided (by AI).

PopeBeanie:

I’m really curious to learn how AI in autocratically run societies rig their LLMs to respond with propaganda, gas lighting, and other fact-purging streams of bullshit. (LOL i.e. Trumpisms?! Putinisms? Used car salesmanisms? Marketing campaigns…)

King Iyk has made it pretty clear how Christians can use AI to spout pse…[Read more]

PopeBeanie:

Walt Whitman wrote “Be curious, not judgmental”

If AI is to be a tool for the of human beings, our curiosity needs satisfaction and we have to make judgements about what AI does and produces. AI is not serving when it just regurgitates whatever supports any irrational nonsense someone believes, and does so at greater cost of energy.

TheEncogitationer wrote:
They have a long way to go before we humans should entrust them with running anything.

LLMs will be increasing customizable wrt which sources of original data can be designated as most reliable. In some, one can already save your own references/database locally, e.g. in PDF files. Very technical, scientific, and medical…[Read more]

Simon:

Someone said that the reason LLM validates @kingiyk‘s “proof” of God’s existence, is that the internet is full of information and discourse that agrees with it. Whereas, there’s not much on the true existence of Dracula. So, the LLM repeats what it sees.

There’s the whole article in last week’s Sunday School about how AI validates wha…

[Read more]