NEWS about the NEWS Media, Favorite Investigative News Sources, and Their Best Stories

PopeBeanie wrote:

I’ve removed MSNBC from my YouTube feed, but not from Twitter. This tweet is nice and short, and is worth discussing. Wouldn’t it be ironic if Elon could contribute to the Single Party Takeover?

[Read more]

PopeBeanie wrote:

I’m also thinking that Twitter’s life is probably extended now with the buyout, since its ad model wasn’t life-sustaining, and it looks like consumer fees will drive content, at least in part. And Elon may find ways to promote certain tweeters over others, but I can’t guess how or how soon. The outcome may become “free speech”,…

[Read more]

I’ve removed MSNBC from my YouTube feed, but not from Twitter. This tweet is nice and short, and is worth discussing. Wouldn’t it be ironic if Elon could contribute to the Single Party Takeover?

“You could secretly ban one party’s candidate…secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else and the rest of us mi…

[Read more]

Autumn wrote:

News or provocation? We live in the era of infinite anger.

Yes, both; sometimes twisted and often conflated. I was on Twitter within weeks of it starting up, handle “acme” for years until I left and neglected it for years and lost the handle to a commercial org. Only recently have I realized/admitted the importance of Twitter as a…[Read more]

News or provocation? We live in the era of infinite anger.

Circa 2022 APR 27

Elon’s buying twitter. Small sample of tweets from conservatives.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene
@RepMTG

Stop the Democrat’s war on women & children.

Keep biological males out of girls/women’s private spaces & sports.

Ban all pediatric gender clinics, puberty blockers, & gender reassignment surgeries on minors.

End sex…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:

Here is an article about Jordan Peterson from a Vancouver interview about JP on religion.

Some of that makes sense to me straight away, but some of it I don’t understand at first sight.

I’ll be honest, I find it hard to understand what he’s talking about.  But there must be something about the general “stand up straight, shine your shoes” tenor that can benefit lost young men.

I don’t even have a problem with that really. The meandering delivery, I mean. I wouldn’t pay to watch it. A two-four, and the right friend and I could reproduce the same thing on the cheap in my own living room. Sometimes I even enjoy it, every sentence walking the line between abstract poetry, puzzle, and dadaism. It’s just when it’s wielded…[Read more]

Here is an article about Jordan Peterson from a Vancouver interview about JP on religion.

 And yes (don’t hate me, woke people) I was on the Jordan Peterson Facebook frontline savaging his opponents.

Germane to the thread, for a time he represented the brokenness of the internet and contemporary media. Peterson has things to account for. For a man who was ‘silenced’ (the claim of some of his fans) his voice became the single loudest vo…[Read more]

I was 16 when I first had real access to the internet (a regular connection and not just the text based internet). I used AOL which was a truly fantastic place to discover the online world. There was a large selection of chat rooms and back then chatting was really fun. There were very few trolls (they were quickly kicked out of the rooms).…[Read more]

The internet has been mainly fun for me, except for one face-reddening incident where I didn’t understand how Facebook worked.  I’ve had fun making a website (now gone) and posting my mixtapes and mp3s, and seeing the results.  I’ve fallen in love at least once.  I’m pretty sure that the locals keep a Whatsapp group about me and monitor my Fa…[Read more]

We evolved to have face-to-face relationships, limited to only dozens or scores of other humans. What seems natural now, really isn’t “natural”.

For me the heyday of the internet was in the early 2000s. Back then, the internet afforded you a way to find communities you may have other wise been cut off from allowing the non-normals to find their…[Read more]

Davis wrote:

Why is it that the BBC and CBC etc. are so loved but that PBS and NPR are virtually ignored by most Americans (or even detested?).

I don’t know for sure, but think it’s just because of the polarization here, each side so anxious to demonize the other. I don’t watch MSNBC. But I’ll show my colors here and admit to believing that…[Read more]

_Robert_ wrote:

Anytime I have attempted to see what is going on with FOX, I feel physically ill within minutes.

I gave them a look during the siege on the capitol, and was favorably impressed. But that’s it, I’m afraid to see what they’re saying about CPAC.

Kristina wrote:

In light of the story in the op, leaning worse, I guess.

I see the world today in terms of constantly increasing virulence of social networking. Institutions and commercial media have been adopting technology to broadcast propaganda and buzz ever since the printing press was invented. It started slowly, with local, then wider read…[Read more]

Try this guy for a non-corporate level-headed take on the news:

Here is his post for today:

If you like, skip past the 7 or 8 minutes of pre-show to where the show itself really begins.

My vague impression is that CBC in particular has earthier roots than either PBS or NPR. It’s older than either of them, and its existence as a national broadcaster in Canada established it as an essential Canadian voice in media as an alternative to more regionalized offerings, or American media.

Originally, it probably grabbed a much bigger…[Read more]