Gregg R Thomas

_Robert_ wrote:
A “friend of a friend” might know some things.

That’s true.  But this was before mobile phones, and none of us could confirm the prediction until I went home, when it had all played out to the letter.

Unseen wrote:
You’ve got it backward, Simon. Photons go into the eyes. They don’t shoot out of them.

Lol, the photons have to come out of a light source, bounce off something and go into your eyes.

Simon Paynton wrote:

Unseen wrote:
the mere act of observing some events (simply knowing about them, in other words) has some way of modifying them.

Surely observing requires photons to knock into and bounce off something, therefore, potentially modifying it.

You’ve got it backward, Simon. Photons go into the eyes. They don’t shoot out of them.

Unseen wrote:
the mere act of observing some events (simply knowing about them, in other words) has some way of modifying them.

Surely observing requires photons to knock into and bounce off something, therefore, potentially modifying it.

@ Simon

If anyone wants an area ripe for investigation by parapsychologists, it’s psychokinesis since it seems experimentally proven that the mere act of observing some events (simply knowing about them, in other words) has some way of modifying them. (Split Screen Experiment)

Unseen wrote:
If I ever had an astrological reading telling me that I would set aside my teenage leaning toward being an Episcopal clergyman in favor of becoming an atheist philosopher whose main interests were linguistic philosophy and the questions surrounding free will consciousness, I’d be impressed on one level,

Well, any given medium is o…[Read more]

Simon Paynton wrote:
went to college with someone who was completely unsuited to her course, and her chart says “you will do things that you are completely unsuited for”.  I have seen a number of other weirdly specific accuracies.

J.B. Rhine was a scientist with a specialty in researching parapsychology. One of the main critiques of his rese…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
I made up a few generic paragraphs that sounded profound but very vague.

Yes, but being vague and general doesn’t prove anything.  Those things apply equally to everybody.

My college friend’s chart didn’t say “analytical scientist”, and mine didn’t say “totally unsuited to your occupation”.  They are very specific.

I once did Horrorscope readings for 5 different star signs. All were very keen to have it done by a professional 🙂

I made up a few generic paragraphs that sounded profound but very vague. “You are happy to work on a task on your own but also enjoy being part of a team when the task allows for your own skill sets to be called upon”.  I spoke…[Read more]

Here is one of the co-authors of Project 2025 discussing the plans.

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
accurate.

I find Randi’s debunking unconvincing.  He’s chosen traits that everyone has or wants, and everyone wants to be Bluebeard the pirate.

Unseen wrote:
This is as good as any place to pass along a meme I made yesterday:

That’s a good meme.  I heard on World Service that Trump is trying to distance himself from it, maybe because it looks sinister.

The “conservative” (i.e., corrupt) commentator they had on said it was a success for them to politicise the judiciary as they have done.

I would call it a truism. You would have to be mad to think otherwise 🙂

Thanks Reg!!!

However, and I don’t know why, the professional birth charts that people can draw up seem to be very accurate.

This is as good as any place to pass along a meme I made yesterday:

The Trumpster thinks that all Christians are evangelical and either play golf or are obsessed with it and share his obsession with crowd size.

I find that those newspaper astrology columns say things that are generically true for everyone, that’s why people think they’re accurate.  You could read any one of the twelve signs, and think it applies to you.

However, and I don’t know why, the professional birth charts that people can draw up seem to be very accurate.  Mine has a Grand T…[Read more]

Have a great week everyone!

The difference between faith and insanity is that faith is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence whereas insanity is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence.

William Harwood (Dictionary of Contemporary Mythology, London, 1st Books,…[Read more]