williamchess
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoFlavivirus implications are more “frightening” to theists than to atheists; we accept natural selection and its consequences.
Think MMO, means, motives, opportunities. The current crop of theists in America’s government seem determined to reduce the means and opportunities to cope with the consequences.
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoScience requires both deduction and induction.
One without the other — such as Albert Einstein’s thought experiments, or mathematics only, or theoretical physics — can and has resulted in flawed science and vast waste of taxpayers’ money.
-
Rodrigo Moreira Pavanelli joined the group
Bookish atheists 7 years, 8 months ago -
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months ago -
_Robert_ replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoI simply adore this video and it really is all about how science works and would also inspire anyone who is not afraid to think.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yEX_OI0xbQ
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoFlavivirus research (including Zika), from mid-2016.
-
PopeBeanie started the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoI plan for this thread provide illustrations of how science works. I ask that any additional posts to this thread be made brief; to the point wrt the process(es) of observation, discovery, hypotheses, formulation of theory, experimentation, publication, or your views on the process itself.
The “simple to advanced” aspect to these posts gives us…[Read more]
-
-
Emma Leigh joined the group
Bookish atheists 7 years, 9 months ago -
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoTom, I don’t even see hardball here. Not even a swing, when you’re asked a specific question wrt your view on evidence (e.g. blue-shift).
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoI think Tom does make a valid point that cosmology has become very dependent on mathematical models and we do have to remember that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I have seen ample empirical evidence in my own working fields of GPS navigation and weather RADAR that supports relativistic and doppler effects but after reading…[Read more]
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoPB, you ask softball questions. I play hardball and ignore them.
You want fair?
Click on the Chris Reeves article I linked to a while ago. To the right on the page you will see is a menu on which you can start your own personal journey.
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoAll of it is science fiction? Even LIGO measurements and blue-shift? These are softball questions!
You say EU is up against a vast conspiracy of institutionally entrenched scientists pushing BB. That’s not fair, when I can’t even get you to say what you’d like us to be researching. I’ve asked a few times now, which is fair, because we’re sharing…[Read more]
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoThis discussion on the kind of science that requires evidence and reason is becoming a discussion on science fiction. No thanks, PB, Reg and Robert.
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoHere is an article worth a read. The idea of being able to determine the location of the particle is interesting. It does make it less random – or more deterministic. I try to think of everything as being expressed in waves and that all fields are made up of waves. If a wave stretched across the entire Universe (and why not?) then “spooky action …[Read more]
-
_Robert_ posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoEngineers…
So in my FB feed there is this post/thread about how someone had lunch next to a table of boring engineers and then there are ten posts all in agreement that engineers are so “by the book”, lack common sense and are actually “stupid” and “Lack imagination” etc. So I mentioned yeah, we are by the book and those books are science, math,…[Read more] -
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoYes !
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agored-bulled light
Starbucks!
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic Quantum Mechanics – Pilot Wave proposals in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 9 months agoSome galaxies are blue-shifts…so you besides tired light we need red-bulled light.
- Load More