_Robert_

By the way, do you think that speaking up against religion also “just strengthens the right”?

That depends entirely on the country and the religion being discussed. Criticizing religion (practices not people) is rather uncontroversial in most of northern Europe and society is so secular that right-wing parties wouldn’t have a hope of getting pra…[Read more]

@Simon, do you think that Buzzfeed did anything wrong because I think they are a bunch of lying shits.

@davis Great post. +1

Here is the response from Krauss.

Not another bloody outrage over false accusations of rape. Jesus fucking christ.

What is bullshit is obsessing about this problem solely through the lens of women accusing rape. There is a bias screaming out in most of these complaints and it focuses on three things. 1 Rape is a different kind of crime than other crimes. 2. Women often claims…[Read more]

Here is one I intended to put in Sunday School.

Why have I never seen that picture before!! Most excellent!!

The rain it raineth on the just

And also on the unjust fella: But chiefly on the just, because

The unjust steals the just’s umbrella.

Yes Tom I found that too:

Tom – I have previously debunked several claims made in other “evidence” you have linked regarding the EU hypothesis…

I have not claimed to have debunked the EU hypothesis, only much of what was offered in evidence to support it and only in the links provided. I will re-post it later and you can explain to me where I am wrong.

@ PopeBeanie, here is an article on conspiracy theory worth a read.

OK Tom but I remember almost everything I posted over the last 9 years and every debate and discussion I was engaged in. I have no recollection of using the word “debunk” in the context you stated. I have access to the old TA site and cannot find it. However it was mostly only on AZ that I pointed out where I found what you posted from…[Read more]

@Tom – please show me where I suggested that “debunk” required only my opinion and I will hold my hands up. I doubt if I would consider my subjective opinion as a valid reason to negate an hypothesis. I did not debunk EU, I just supplied arguments based upon what I know of Physics which appeared to undermine many of its arguments. You never…[Read more]

@Tom – Can you at least point out what post of mine needs debunking. I don’t want or expect any quarter given to anything I post. There are plenty of people here to debunk it and I can handle that without needing a safe space 🙂

Still waiting 🙂

yesterday is much less important.

Pity. I used to respect what you had to say and found your commentary, even stuff I disagreed with, useful. But you’ve jumped into the deep end of whatever this is called, and seem to take pleasure in ducking and dodging. I hope you aren’t up to the same trollish antics on other websites.

A toast to GR so.

When Einstein was sailing across the Atlantic to the USA, he spent 3 days in conversation with Chaim Weizmann who later became the first President of Israel. Weizmann later went on to say that it was a rather one sided conversation as he just spoke about his new Theory but that at the end of the voyage he was convinced that…[Read more]

In fact the opposite is true. The FF members actively sponsor JWBL on an almost nightly basis. It is their favorite thing. I often drop in to get an argument started. “So guys do you agree that existence is not a predicate?” or “Why don’t we ever find fronkey fossils?” and leave them to it. I only drink once a year, a single Johnnie Walker Black …[Read more]