unapologetic

jakelafort wrote:
It is wild to me and yet unsurprising that Simon who is into ethics/morality and writing a book about it has so little negative reaction to Islam.

I recognise all the criticisms.  But I think there’s more that can be said about Islam than blanket criticism.

I’m interested in the origins of religion and what it’s supposed to be…[Read more]

Strega wrote:
Attilla the Hun … Genghis Khan … Alexander III of Macedonia

Yes, but those people didn’t teach people nice manners and things like that.

I don’t consider that Islam is an organisation dedicated to evil.  It’s supposed to be making the world a better place, especially for people who believe in it.  I believe it does succeed in some respects that can be seen and felt by people who don’t suffer its bad effects.

But human nature is a faulty and wonky thing, Islam is strongly p…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
How much science should there be in philosophy?

Our understanding of the world around us (whether through metaphysics or other means) cannot go against our best scientific knowledge.  Not only that, the right way of doing metaphysics requires a close investigation of science and its results.

I can’t disagree with…[Read more]

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
The Problem Is Islam—Not Islamism

I have to assume that the author, Obaid Omer, knows his stuff because he grew up in a Muslim family and culture.

Yes, to an atheist, Islam seems extreme, unbending and oppressive.  It’s also been hijacked by patriarchy.  But I disagree with what a commenter said – that it’s inc…[Read more]

It looks hard.  Does it have any practical applications?

Unseen wrote:
However, when I stumbled onto Laws of Form, it blew my mind.

Why did it blow your mind?  I’ve heard it said it’s like an LSD trip for mathematicians.

jakelafort wrote:
Point is all of the antecedents have to be examined to have a clear indication of why an individual is a lefty or righty. Pointing to some innate or chosen personality trait or empathy etc is misleading.

There are some personality traits that broadly correlate with left and right, but that doesn’t mean they cause them.  Left…[Read more]

jakelafort wrote:
So yeah the average Trump supporter v the average progressive? Better educated is the progressive i have to assume. Big fat hairy worthless deal. If you want to support humanist values then being a progressive is the absolute worst possible way to do so. Progressives have become what they despise. I am gonna not rant.

It’s a…[Read more]

There are always going to be hot-headed nutters.  A certain person whips them up.  You’re right, it’s not patriotic at all.  People are focused on just one or two things instead of the big picture.  I find that some of the Kamala-objecting Democrats are doing the same thing: objecting to some single issue, without caring that Donald Trump … wel…[Read more]

I guess that sounds childish, but sometimes, exasperated words fail me.

I know four people who support Trump, and they’re all exceptionally intelligent and nice.  So, I don’t get why they don’t smell him a mile off.  He’s a master manipulator.

PopeBeanie wrote:
(Hey buddy, stump rhymes with Trump!)

I guess they’re so stupid that they don’t know they’re stupid, and that Trump is stupid, and that Trump is a liar, a cheat and a fraud.

_Robert_ wrote:
Actually, even the logical construction of the premise is incorrect

You’re right.  If someone is a rapist then they are automatically a criminal.

Unseen wrote:
True premises used in an argument with a valid form must imply a true conclusion.

This is what I’m saying.  Sometimes the premises given aren’t true, but a logically-formed argument can be made out of them.

E.g.  Donald Trump – “All migrants are rapists, criminals or mental patients.”  “X is a migrant.”  Conclusion:  “X is a rapi…[Read more]

Unseen wrote:
C.S. Peirce brilliantly realized that people don’t reason with propositional deduction or even with induction most of the time

Yes, but something can be logical without being true.  A clever speaker uses sophistry and emotion to sway their credulous audience.

Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
– **Balance Between Reason and Imagination**: Blake did not reject reason entirely but advocated for a balance between reason and imagination. He saw the two as complementary forces

I think it’s possible to reason creatively: to come up with new ideas.

Blake sees reason not as a liberating force, but as one that c…

[Read more]

_Robert_ wrote:
Is it reasonable to bend or ignore facts?

Do Republicans ever tell the truth these days?