michael17

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 216 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #31003

    michael17
    Participant

    Michael it is almost certainly super sonic speed of light defying angels. Blake wrote sumpin that is instructive…and the angel told Tom, if he’d be a good boy, he’d have God for his father and never want joy. So there you have it. Blake was in on the prophecy. Blake must have witnessed the angel speed popping the field and used that to keep Tom in line which is what god wants us to do. So be good. Believe. Don’t deceive. Yeah, that is the ticket.

    https://vm.tiktok.com/tm6q67/

    • This reply was modified 2 days, 21 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 days, 21 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30974

    michael17
    Participant

    I dreamt a dream! What can it mean? And that I was a maiden Queen Guarded by an Angel mild: Witless woe was ne’er beguiled! And I wept both night and day, And he wiped my tears away; And I wept both day and night, And hid from him my heart’s delight. So he took his wings, and fled; Then the morn blushed rosy red. I dried my tears, and armed my fears With ten thousand shields and spears. Soon my Angel came again; I was armed, he came in vain; For the time of youth was fled, And grey hairs were on my head. – William Blake I am a fan of Blake’s work. So much so that I have a large tattoo of “The Ancient of Days” on my left shoulder, as in picture 2. Micheal, it is from “Europe a Prophecy” 🙂 My right shoulder is of the first light in the universe, all above a tattoo of Plato’s Cave. More to be done. It is about the nature of reality. Of course I will only ever see a mirror image of my idea of reality so your perception of my reality will always be different to my vision of it. Only about 10 more hours to go……post Covid19….

    Yes platos cave. We only see shadows of what reality really is.  Unable to turn to see what’s producing the shadows. Blake’si work is iconic as the Sistine Chapel. But I must side with not makings images or statues contrary to Mother Church.

    But lockdown is tough, I hear you.

    • This reply was modified 3 days, 21 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 3 days, 21 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30971

    michael17
    Participant

    Michael, give us the UFO scoop. Wah iz it?

    Well  you have 3 choices.

    1)Aliens can travel faster than light ( physically impossible)

    2)Non-Baryonic aliens or angels traveling faster than light (possible, not subject to a Higgs field)

    3)I don’t know or it’s fake news

    #30965

    michael17
    Participant
    Davis wrote:

    However things that are not baryonic can do so an move and accelerate at fantastic rates as always observed of UFO’s.

    Whahhhhhhhhhh?

    The Air Force just disclosed a clip on a UFO. In the past they just swepted under the rug, denied it or just attribute it to weather ballons. This was dramatizad on the History channel “Project Blue Book”
    and now a scientific investigation is being conducted at skinwalker ranch;UFOs, illuminated mountains and radioactivity  anomalies are a regular occurrence their. A NASA scientist just joined the team. The US government did research there but have not disclosed its findings. I don’t believe UFOs are extraterrestrial.

    • This reply was modified 4 days, 7 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 7 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 6 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 6 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30964

    michael17
    Participant

    However things that are not baryonic can do so an move and accelerate at fantastic rates as always observed of UFO’s.

    Whahhhhhhhhhh?

    The Air Force just discloses a clip on a UFO. In the past they just swepted under the rug, denied it or just attribute it to weather ballons. This was dramatized on the History channel Blue Book”
    and now a scientific investigation is being conducted at skinwalker ranch, UFO, illuminated mountains and radio anomalies are a regular occurrence their. A NASA scientist just joined team. The US government did research there but have not disclosed its findings. I don’t believe UFOs extraterrestrial.

    #30963

    michael17
    Participant

    How do those diagrams you gave explain that?

    The diagrams are strictly to exemplify the mechanics of a Hilbert space  in dealing with multiple arrangements.?One of which collapses into event space.

    #30957

    michael17
    Participant

    @Reg you chime in like a particle physicist.
    Particularly you are aware that neutrinos can change flavors in mid flight. like light that vibrates in two perpendicular fields but not without disappearing in the other, neutrino vibrates into space time  from a Hilbert space containing QM waves that are 120 degrees out of phase like AC power. Alternatively 3 manifestations that are perpendicular in Hilbert space as it oscillates. Physicist and string theorist try to roll up hidden dimensions into tight loops. I posit some, if not all, are hidden in Hilbert space. Imagine a space with 11 or 13 dimensions. Well everything written on paper is a mathematical construct until you prove its existence in reality or a higher reality. Meanwhile  we metaphysicist  can muse with artistic license, as long as we don’t violate the equations. I’ve always sided with the school of Copenhagen (Heisenberg). But I’m just an engineer with 40 years of reading scientific magazines.

    #30951

    michael17
    Participant

    When an atom releases a quanta of light or a photon it is immediately plastered on the boundary of our reality, a light cone not to be can’t confused with the spread of light from a point source but rather a world line boundary which has a length projection in the time dimension equal to C x t. This boundary is an event horizon in the dimension of time. Outside the event horizon time is not defined. Energy and mass or equivalent and therefore bound by the Higgs boson. Thus it would take infinite energy for matter or a quanta of light to escape the universe. However things that are not baryonic  can do so an move and accelerate at fantastic rates as always observed of UFO’s.

    • This reply was modified 4 days, 20 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 20 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30945

    michael17
    Participant
      <li style=”list-style-type: none;”>
      <li style=”list-style-type: none;”>

    Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:@ Michael Ok, I won’t even pull a Schrödinger cat out of my hat. 🙂 I will accept on probability that you won’t but can you explain why you contend with certainty that the Christian God is the creative force behind the Quantum Universe we exist in. I mean if you are certain in your belief that your God is behind it all then that is your ultimate reality, is it not?

    It’s a fascinating conjure that He exists in a realm not bound by time nor space. But by inference a believer must accept he must operate in it, if it’s there.

    the local boundary of space-time is defined by a light cone. This boundary is defined as C x t, where C is the speed of light. We think of C has the speed of light but it defines a local boundary of the universe. If you cross over this boundary of the time and space dimension, you will wound up outside our event space. Scientist like to refer to it as  “elsewhere”. and is the “here and now” contain in a “elsewhere”,  and is elsewhere a Hibert space?

    s

    • This reply was modified 4 days, 23 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 23 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 23 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 23 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 4 days, 23 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30942

    michael17
    Participant

    Despite infinite branches existing in the quantum universe or Hilbert space only one outcome can collapse into event space at every instance. I subscribe to Penrose’s supposition, that Hilbert space is a reality and not just a mathematical construct. A Quantum God would be privy to that reality and existing outside of event space with definite spooky action at a distance in time or space.

    LOL, thank you for humoring me. So it seems we agree, mostly, and definitely in the same space-time space, er, universe. 🙂

     🙂

    #30938

    michael17
    Participant

    A Quantum God? Stop it Michael. Just stop it while you are ahead. If you try to measure him you will never know what position he is in. Though when Quantum Jesus was in the grave he was both alive and dead at the same time. No that is wrong. We should express it in terms of probability and express it as a wave function. Even Schrödinger would have approved. But lets get all Bayesian on it first.

    Ok, I won’t even pull a Schrödinger cat out of my hat. 🙂

    #30937

    michael17
    Participant

    Big surprise Michael..you whittled and carved and end in a place where you wont be jesus starved.

    Im not playing fair I’m dealing with a loaded Universe 🙂

    #30931

    michael17
    Participant

    If all possible solutions to how quasicrystals tile a volume  exist (a priori) in Hilbert space, then the conundrum is who or what put it there?

    • This reply was modified 5 days, 5 hours ago by  michael17.
    #30929

    michael17
    Participant

    So I have at least one amateur hour question. Preceded with at least one amateur hour supposition. Supposition (open for your corrections): Either–as I think Jake spoke to–1) there are near-infinite branches, of which none will ever meet again and we can never prove or disprove their existence or empirical natures; or 2) perhaps similarly but nowhere near near-infinite-wise, universes can merge back together almost instantly due to some unexpected law regarding conservation of quantum probability. (Yes, I just made that one up.) I.e. maybe spooky action at a distance has to happen not only in the entanglement that we would see, but with another underlying/invisible entanglement that we wouldn’t presently know how to see, that undoes the previous spooky action at a distance, e.g. with spooky anti-action at a distance. Shazam, two complementary mysteries are better than one, right!? Bringing us immediately back from two universes to one; same old single universe returns every time.

    But here’s the bigger question, assuming I’m wrong above, so split/duplicate universes happen all the time and I just need to get over it. Are there any calculations that predict how often such splits happen? Like, if there are a bazillion such splits nearby, happening a bazillion times per millennium or even per second, then maybe there IS like a Quantum God just having fun with us, or maybe there are even a bazillion Quantum Gods who don’t even ever see each other and meet, much less get to know each other very well. AND FURTHERMORE, does a split that’s caused by some Quantum God a bazillion light years from here plus there potentially being all those other localized-Spooky/Quantum-Gods in our shared sphere of influence (or “sub-universe” or whatever it should be called at any instance in time)… it makes me forget now if I ever had an important question to start with, much less hope anyone can provide a useful answer.

    See, my first proposition is the best. Or (I think) it’s officially my Supposition #2. I dunno, everything appears to me as Quantum-Conflated now.

    So I digressed. Still, I shall name this the “do-undo double-action invisible-probability pilot-wave-equalizer phenomenon” (DDIPP for short), and you are my witnesses when it’s time for the Nobel guys to pick their winners.

    Despite infinite branches existing in the quantum universe or Hilbert space only one outcome can collapse into event space at every instance. I subscribe to Penrose’s supposition, that Hilbert space is  a reality and not just a mathematical construct. A Quantum God would be privy to that reality and existing outside of event space with definite spooky action at a distance in time or space.

    • This reply was modified 5 days, 5 hours ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 5 days, 3 hours ago by  PopeBeanie. Reason: PB-selfish DDIPP bq equalizationator
    #30927

    michael17
    Participant

    I think that Michael is trying to show that it’s only possible for a single outcome to happen, instead of multiple outcomes. Presumably, that’s within one universe. Multiple universes implies multiple realities. The multiverse theory is not so far fetched.

    Simon, you nailed it, thanks!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 216 total)