michael17

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 294 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #33292

    michael17
    Participant

    How many software engineers does it take to change a light-bulb ??

    It depends on how you stack or com-pile their IBM cards.

    #33287

    michael17
    Participant

    @Reg

    I’m not doing anything to dispel the rumor that engineers can’t spell or have poor diction and grammar. Yes. It’s Antonia fortress. If the Jews tore down the dome of the Rock and built it at the misidentified site, it would the prelude to war.

    • This reply was modified 1 month ago by  michael17.
    #33280

    michael17
    Participant

    Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:Who is Antonio when he is at home? Not the Merchant of Venice??

    LOL, Anionio’d fortress was situated 600 feet from the temple uphill so that the Roman Legión housed there can observe the actual  Temple Mount for disturbances. It was connected by a colonnade for rapid deployment, According  to Josephus a battle was waged there as Titus the commander observed. He later became Emperor appointing Josephus as the Empire’s historian.  Antonio’s fortress was a city bigger than the city of David. It was like a palace complete with market places and brothels for the 6000 strong Legion. The wall of the fortress was slightly trapezoidal but sat on an area comparable to other Roman fortresses housing a Legion.Proof positive is that the pool of Siloam and the Gihon spring have been located in the city of David, the water source of the Temple, which once gushed 450 ft in Temple times and fed the Pool of Siloam where the priest were purified.

     

     

    • This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by  michael17.
    #32878

    michael17
    Participant

    Michael, Snopes rated your giant coverup conspiracy “Satire.” Why are you bringing it up as supporting your case?

    I already said that the Smithsonian allegation was false but their actions give us no reason not to believe the story in    a previous post.

    #32877

    michael17
    Participant

    Michael, giants are very unhealthy people with a lot of difficulties in life. They don’t live very long and, The Bible to the contrary, wouldn’t make very good warriors. Educate yourself. Why don’t we grow to be 10 feet tall? How tall can a human grow?

    There were well proportioned mighty giants in the past. Watch the first video in this chain.

    #32876

    michael17
    Participant

    The veracity of the theory of evolution has no dependency on biogenesis. This story is false. “What you see over there aren’t giants, but windmills“, said Sancho.

    For certain, but it questions whether we can remove the source of life or a creator out of the picture. What blows life into inanimate star stuff?

    #32842

    michael17
    Participant

    Well, michael17, it’s just your bad luck that the theory of evolution is pretty well proven, giants or no giants.

    Not all of the tenets of evolution are untrue. Just remember that until science can account for biogenesis all cards are still on the table.  But in regard to hominid evolution, it is certainly    an unproven narrative that changes virtually every year. Good luck pruning the ever changing incomplete bush from which we allegedly originate.

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  michael17.
    #32833

    michael17
    Participant

    Not buying that story about evolution, eh Michael?

    I’m partial to this mans stance:

    https://youtu.be/iGuIgEpH5U4

    #32829

    michael17
    Participant

    Actually despite purchasing thousands of giant skeletons and “loosing” them the never admitted to doing it deliberately and their motive is unknown. However the Smithsonian dogged pro evolution stance gives little reason to deny the false report. Certainly the evidence of 8 -30 foot humans does not necessarily prove the existence of the nephilim; the offspring of angels and man.

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  PopeBeanie.
    #32823

    michael17
    Participant

    The Smithsonian has admitted to covering up evidence of giants purportedly to preserve the narrative of evolution.

     

    https://youtu.be/sVmOnwng6gs

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  PopeBeanie.
    #32622

    michael17
    Participant

    The scarecrow in my field in tied to a planck. That allows him certain degrees of freedom to appear in a different part of the field every time I look over at him. I think he likes the indeterminacy it affords him because when he looks at the world through his rose-tinted quantum shades he finds the future is not determined unequivocally by the past. All future events are interactions that cannot be foretold. He had a dream that because everything is made of atoms and atoms in turn are made of energy particles that nothing matters. All of Space is a one big field of energy fluctuations that give the illusion of having solid objects within it. I think I will prevent him from eating granular and finite amounts of blue cheese at night to see if he gets a better nights’ sleep.

    You are a distinguished gentlemen known by use of clever prose. 🙂

    #32617

    michael17
    Participant

    I think you are not distinguishing dark matter from dark energy. It’s true that the cosmological constant could account for dark energy. Why would I need to distinguish them? Are you claiming that there is no equivalence between E and M in “dark space” (my term)? It is the basis of Einstein’s theory. Or do you mean that matter and the “field” are different? That is, matter is E and M but the Field is only energy and not the classical interpretation of Einstein where it is both? Personally I visualize “everything” in terms of Fields. I am a farmer after all and still outstanding in my own field 🙂

    Well neither matter nor energy are a field but they are in need equivalent. Both can have a gravitational field ,a electric field and a magnetic field. To date there is no direct relationship of dark matter to dark energy despite sharing the word dark. Dark connotes that we simply don’t know. But in the wild head scratching arena of researchers trying to make heads or tails of things, I am sure someone offered the straw man dark E=dark M* C^2. If not then you farmer Reg have put that straw man outstanding in your field🙂

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  michael17.
    • This reply was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  michael17.
    #32616

    michael17
    Participant

     

    https://physicsworld.com/a/new-particle-links-dark-matter-with-missing-antimatter/

    Contrary to your assertion that “anti particles have been posited for dark matter, however tests have ruled it out.” your link speculates about a new particle. I don’t see that anti-particles have been ruled out conclusively. There’s a lot of speculation in that article, which is a magazine article not any sort of peer-reviewed scientific paper.

    My point is that, what was posited in 2010 about dark matter being hidden antimatter is not true, ipso facto, since by 2020 no such claim has been proven or published.

    Well never matter nor energy are a field but they are in need equivalent. Both can have a gravitational field ,a electric field and a magnetic field. To date there is direct relationship of dark matter to dark energy despite sharing the word dark. Dark connotes that we simply don’t know. But in the wild head scratching arena of researchers trying to make heads or tails of things, I am sure someone offered the straw man dark E=dark M* C^2. If not then you farmer Reggie have put that straw man outstanding in your field🙂

    #32613

    michael17
    Participant

    https://physicsworld.com/a/new-particle-links-dark-matter-with-missing-antimatter/

    Contrary to your assertion that “anti particles have been posited for dark matter, however tests have ruled it out.” your link speculates about a new particle. I don’t see that anti-particles have been ruled out conclusively. There’s a lot of speculation in that article, which is a magazine article not any sort of peer-reviewed scientific paper.

    My point is that, what was posited in 2010 about dark matter being hidden antimatter is not true, ipso facto, since by 2020 no such claim has been proven or published.

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 4 weeks ago by  michael17.
    #32603

    michael17
    Participant

    universe…

    without some form of intervention, the universe is a conundrum. Moreover empty space is missing virtual particles by wild orders of magnitude

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 294 total)