Simon Paynton

  • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 3 months ago

    The article given, says: “As to the more exciting explanations, I doubt that religion causes stupidity if only because some of the most brilliant people of history, such as Isaac Newton, were highly religious like most of their contemporaries. … In short, discussing correlations between IQ and religiosity without a grasp of the relevant…[Read more]

    • RE: Newton. Of course he was religious, the alternative was prison or death like with Galileo. FFS Simon, take a look at the most religious countries and US states and tell me how great their lives are. Maybe you need a trip to Mississippi or Saudi and chat with all the geniuses there.
    • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 3 months ago

      Do you have a source?

      • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 3 months ago

        It’s a point of view. I think it’s a fallacy that atheists are more intelligent than religious people. But there is a difference in world views. I believe that an atheist might see religion as a great lumbering machinery that just gets in the way of real life. I think it’s just a different way of seeing the world.

        • TheEncogitationer wrote:
          the English Language Arts Notebook

          These books sound really good.  Do you think a person could really learn the basics of these subjects, by reading them?  Is the writing good?

        • Unseen wrote:
          Even Einstein’s theories can be explained at a high level in plain language to people of average intelligence. As one gets deeper into it, of course, eyes start glazing over. However, with the fractal theory of consciousness, I fear eyes will glaze over right from the start.

          People want the world to be simple.  But it’s not.  Exp…[Read more]

        • Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
          Five good reasons to reject Moral Philosophy.

          I agree substantially with the author, Ronnie de Sousa, that much of conventional moral philosophy is the biggest pile of godawful junk I’ve ever seen.  When he says he wants to reject Kantianism and the mono-track of utilitarianism, that’s a good place to start.

          At the…[Read more]

        • Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
          A look at the philosophy of David Hume.

          This article is beautifully written, by Sara Papic.  I could take a leaf out of her book, for my own.  Perhaps her writing is a little bit bland, and could do with some more colour.

        • @jakelafort – I agree with you, using the term POC is as if white people are the standard, and everyone else is strange or special.  Perhaps non-white would be a more neutral term.  But then, it sounds like it’s saying someone is a non-person.

          Is it right to find a catch-all term for everyone who isn’t white?  I guess like you say, it’s ne…[Read more]

        • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

          You’re conflating wokeness, which is a good thing in principle, with cancel culture, which is toxic. Most people do that. When someone criticises wokeness, they’re not usually criticising social liberation and equal rights. They’re criticising cancel culture. Everyone hates cancel culture except for those who indulge in it. It makes…[Read more]

        • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

          Cancel culture is counter-productive because all it does is create enemies.

          • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

            I don’t see how you can defend it on the grounds that “everyone does it too”. That doesn’t make something OK. Yes, there will be a response when someone says something outrageous – but what response is the best one? Unnecessary oppression will result in resentment. Rational debate can win people round and keep them there.

              • Simon, you are deluded in thinking that there is a free market place of ideas where rational debate ultimately wins in most things entirely on their own merits without activism and public pressure. As though segregation and black rights ever would have advanced without activism and people having to pay a social price. In the age of social…

                [Read more]

                • Cancel culture is counter-productive because all it does is create enemies.
                  • So Simon, it’s better to stay silent so you don’t rock the boat and let the people on top continue discriminating and perpetuating injustices? If people played by your rule book we’d still be living in a colonialist world with slavery, Western women in the kitchen with no vote and a lot of feudal landlords. I cannot even tell what it is that…

                    [Read more]

                  • You’re conflating wokeness, which is a good thing in principle, with cancel culture, which is toxic. Most people do that. When someone criticises wokeness, they’re not usually criticising social liberation and equal rights. They’re criticising cancel culture. Everyone hates cancel culture except for those who indulge in it. It makes…

                    [Read more]

              • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

                You’re right in that extremist bullies of all shades engage in it, but perhaps only the left is honest about using it, so they get called out for it. Also, I’m sure you’re right that the enemies of the left use it as a stick to beat them with. But they deserve it. Nobody likes being gagged and told what they are allowed to say or think, on…[Read more]

                • Simon, human beings always pay a social consequence for saying stupid shit. If a politician stood up in parliament and said “I shit on the Queen and the Union Jack” you can imagine they would be out of a job quickly (just as it would happen in a company). You would also find people fiercely responding at dinner tables, social clubs, sport…

                  [Read more]

                  • I don’t see how you can defend it on the grounds that “everyone does it too”. That doesn’t make something OK. Yes, there will be a response when someone says something outrageous – but what response is the best one? Unnecessary oppression will result in resentment. Rational debate can win people round and keep them there.
                      • Simon, you are deluded in thinking that there is a free market place of ideas where rational debate ultimately wins in most things entirely on their own merits without activism and public pressure. As though segregation and black rights ever would have advanced without activism and people having to pay a social price. In the age of social…

                        [Read more]

                        • Cancel culture is counter-productive because all it does is create enemies.
                          • So Simon, it’s better to stay silent so you don’t rock the boat and let the people on top continue discriminating and perpetuating injustices? If people played by your rule book we’d still be living in a colonialist world with slavery, Western women in the kitchen with no vote and a lot of feudal landlords. I cannot even tell what it is that…

                            [Read more]

                          • You’re conflating wokeness, which is a good thing in principle, with cancel culture, which is toxic. Most people do that. When someone criticises wokeness, they’re not usually criticising social liberation and equal rights. They’re criticising cancel culture. Everyone hates cancel culture except for those who indulge in it. It makes…

                            [Read more]

                  • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

                    So Jake, you’re saying that cancelling people is bad when the right wing or religious people do it, but good when the left does it? Is that not hypocritical?

                    • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

                      I think it’s spiteful and vindictive, whoever does it.

                        • Davis you are correct.

                          I suppose cancel culture is a manifestation of tribalism. The greater the power of the dominant tribe the greater the backlash against individuals who oppose or act against the power. Calling it cancel culture is just a new wrapper to express the outrage of the far right against the subordinates. Dominant groups do…

                          [Read more]

                          • So Jake, you’re saying that cancelling people is bad when the right wing or religious people do it, but good when the left does it? Is that not hypocritical?
                        • Simon Paynton posted a new activity comment 5 years, 4 months ago

                          Michael Shermer is espousing my ideas, for example, the “pressure to thrive” in this article https://henrycenter.tiu.edu/2021/03/can-science-discover-moral-truths/ and elsewhere. On the one hand, this is good, and to be welcomed. On the other hand, it means he can use his advantage as an already-published author to beat me to the finishing…[Read more]

                        • If Michael Shermer is going to publish my ideas, he needs to do the right thing and credit where he got them from. Us little people can’t get a book published “just like that”.

                        • Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
                          What constitutes a flourishing human life?

                          The argument of the author, Hrishikesh Joshi, that flourishing lies in human reasoning, and that speaking our minds allows for greater reasoning, and therefore flourishing – is neat.  But I don’t buy the angle that flourishing lies (only) in greater reasoning abilities.  I…[Read more]

                        • You’re right, it’s so difficult that it’s not fair.  There are so many people proclaiming so many different versions of why you’re going to hell for harmless things, that you give up listening (and become an atheist, and work our your own version of right and wrong).

                        • Load More