unapologetic

[unapologeticParticipant]

If I take what you said literally I’m both liable for referring the copyrighted work to the AI but not liable because the AI (“no human”) created.

I take that to mean that I (a third party) can use the generated art any way I want with no liability. As if in Public Domain. It is different from the original, so I’m not infringing on the original creator. And you have no IP claim, so I am not infringing on yours.

 

[unapologeticParticipant]

Unseen wrote:

2) I’ll bet you don’t like Borat, either!

Correct.

Unseen wrote:Can we, for example, countenance a universe in which there’s an Earth populated beings all of whom are either Mickey Mouse or Daisy Duck?

Yes, I used to own that comic. Disney sued.

Decades ago I used to own a copy of a college dissertation on the multiverse that got the author hired in the comics industry. He even rose to become editor. (I forgot his name).

[unapologeticParticipant]

Wow Cunk is annoying. Why would anyone consent to an interview with her?

[unapologeticParticipant]

Is sugar addictive?: Oh, absolutely. (as I sit here binging on egg nog)

[unapologeticParticipant]

What will humans look like in 50,000 years?:
We won’t necessarily evolve ‘better’. There are several flaws in us that are not being bread out. But instead being compensated for.
Take my poor eyesight for example. Maybe that trend can be halted with a gene therapy. But if Lazer surgery is cheaper, maybe not.
Lazer surgery being another way to compensate, and still be able to pass on the poor eyesight gene.
The article speculates we will be more homogenized. I doubt that. There is just as much chance of us spliting into different branches.
The enviroment will change, and enviromental conditions is a big driver of evolution. Long term diet is also.
People in the poor regons of the world will be smaller. People in the well-off regions will be more obese. And neither will be attracted to the other.

[unapologeticParticipant]

moral blank slates at birth?:
Babys are notoriously selfish. Not moral.
In the study, babies favored the ‘helper’ puppet, not out of morals or empathy for the ‘struggling’ puppet. But out of self interest.
We all want to be cared for. “Help me too”.
Morals in the test babies would have been reaching for the ‘struggling’ puppet, to help it also.

[unapologeticParticipant]

Atheist chaplains:
Working for the other side is still suporting the other side. Justifying religin’s existance.
He never challenges the believers he minesters.
“especially as humanity grapples with existential threats”
What ‘existential threats’? Climate change in spite of ‘god’s will’?

[unapologeticParticipant]

“Innocent until proven guilty”

Right. I know the police are of the opposite opinion. Guilty until proven otherwise.

[unapologeticParticipant]

For about 2 months I’ve been getting random messages (at about one a week) from debt relief/tax relief agencies.

Ha. Each gives an ‘opt-out’ of future calls instruction. A give-away that it is a cold call.  I will say, these ladies have really nice voices. I want to call back and ask to meet.

[unapologeticParticipant]

Wow, ‘Venus’.    That’s really nasty. I’d report him. I’ll bet he is not as untraceable as he claims.

If he doesn’t write a follow-up he must think his marks are very gullible. He talks too much. He put everything (except a screenshot of you jerking off) in his first (probably only) letter. He is seriously worried he will be ignored. If it was a real threat it would include that screenshot of you jerking off.

[unapologeticParticipant]

A new one to me. On my phone today:
“Hi, This is (crackel) from (crackel)ity.
Your 60% discount on your monthly bill will be deactivated today unless confirmed. to keep this (crackel) active
please call the number to split(?) down your caller ID immediately. Thank you.” Also a bunch of short (crackels) between the words.
Right. Am I dumb enough to call and ask ‘You’re who? from where?’ because I don’t want to loose my 60% discount on something I don’t have or want.
Maybe “(crackel)ity.” is Infinity. Which I don’t have or want.
All my monthly bills come via USPS. and would tell me of any changes well in advance.

[unapologeticParticipant]

Question:
Are there any legal repercussions to refusing to recognize Diplomas from certain states or schools? Say Oklahoma?
If the Department of Education should cease to exist, Who enforces that?

[unapologeticParticipant]

A few of the job aplications I’ve filled out in my day, had math questions to test your education.
If I was in the position to hire people, I’d include a few science questions. To test their education.
Selecting for education is legally not discrimination. Right?
I don’t care what they believe, but if they carelessly answer “6000 years” they are too dumb to know they are poorly educated.

[unapologeticParticipant]

Your cop reminds me of my building manager.
Two months ago, when she was new, just before the election.
I was throwing out some Rump propaganda into the trashcan nearest to the mail boxes.
It was full, I was packing it down, when she came out of the elevator.
She rushed over and demanded “What are you throwing away?”
Me: “Who wants to know?” This is our first meeting.
“I’m the building manager, and I’m asking you what you are throwing in there?” I’m not impressed.
Me: “I’m a tennet and I’m asking why you’re asking?” (cus it’s none of your business).
While she was stunned by my lack of fear, I walked away.
THIS WEEK:
I was in her office on another matter. I brought up the ‘trash can incedent’.
Me: “You want to know what I was throwing out?
Maybe it was broken whips and dildos.” (So it’s none of your dam business.) She threw me out of her office for swearing.
‘Dildoes’ is swearing? I’m sure she has one.

[unapologeticParticipant]

“Select the word below whose meaning is closest to: “smeke””
“argute, insouciant, eadness, coquetry, geason, ithand, inexorable,
For me the correct answer is “I have no clue. Never heard them before.” But I wasn’t given that choice.
I looked them up later, I got 3 right by guessing.
And one that I thought I knew, was wrong.
Select the word below whose meaning is closest to: “factitious”
I wanted to quip “bible” but that wasn’t a choice.
The rank-order section was imposable. I don’t know or care enough to rank them. Just give me true/false questions on personality. I’m just gonna lie anyway.
There was too much repetition. How many ways can I say I’m the life of the party. (I’m actually not) I think those type surveys are designed to catch you being inconsistent (lying).

[Author]

Posts