We are a community, social networking, & news site focused on bringing free thinkers together, & Breaking the misconceptions about atheism.
Latest Activity
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
King Iyk wrote:
You cannot reasonably expect me to prioritize your opinion over that of a system more knowledgeable than you and demonstrably superior at processing and validating data. That is precisely the point.Yes, but:
- argument from authority never cuts it.
- AI can’t tell you if the inputs to your argument are real or not: if there…
-
jakelafort replied to the topic Sunday School December 14th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 4 months agoThe absurdity of the god question.
Lets ponder Superman or Masked Marvel instead.
Our insignificance in an uncaring and vast universe that’s crazily abstruse and yet the need to make it intelligible and purposive. Figuring it out or trying is in our nature but assuming we are the big cheese is infantile. There are no words to convey how Trump…[Read more]
-
TheEncogitationer replied to the topic Sunday School December 14th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 4 months agoSimon,
But you’re talking from the position of your armchair, off the top of your head, with no evidence.
The burden of proof rests with those who assert that there was a Garden of Eden/Golden Age/Noble Savagery.
Also, we know there is both intra-species and inter-species violence in the Animal Kingdom and the Primate Order of which Humans a…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School December 14th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 4 months agoTheEncogitationer wrote:
There was NO Garden of Eden, NO Golden Age, NO Noble Savagery.However, Power, oppression, and patriarchy did exist at least on a small scale and money existed when barter got too complicated
But you’re talking from the position of your armchair, off the top of your head, with no evidence.
Uh, ackshuyally, that did…
-
King Iyk replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
King Iyk wrote:
You could disprove this entire demonstration by conceiving an alternative demonstration of GodWe’re not going to do this, because we’re atheists and don’t believe in God, and none of us believes it’s possible to prove (or disprove) the existence of God. If we’re arguing against your argument for the proof…
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
King Iyk wrote:
The 12-hour clock is not introduced as a mere human preference but as the actual temporal framework in which the crucifixion was recorded by the cultures that carried it out (Roman and Jewish). When Jewish and Roman timekeeping are synchronized at that historical event, the result is not a vague pattern but a specific geometric… -
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
King Iyk wrote:
You could disprove this entire demonstration by conceiving an alternative demonstration of GodWe’re not going to do this, because we’re atheists and don’t believe in God, and none of us believes it’s possible to prove (or disprove) the existence of God.
If we’re arguing against your argument for the proof of God’s existence,…[Read more]
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
This guy was posting this “mod math exists, therefore trinity” BS here like a year ago. If he didn’t understand your proof of Dracula is the same exact thing, we can at least admit he is a true theist. About as useless to science as the creationists. There will be no thesis, there will be no dissertation. No Nobel prize for discovering god.
The…[Read more]
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
You have somewhat improved your “proof” by changing it from a raw “+” to “mod 9” but your argument still fails because the mapping from theology to numbers is arbitrary.
God = 12 and Trinity = 18 are merely chosen assignments.
“Base-10 law” is not an “immutable law of reality”. Digital-root tricks depend on base-10 representation (becau…[Read more]
-
King Iyk replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 4 months ago
This will be the last time I will repeat what has already been stated succinctly.
“No standard operation for A + B + C + D = A”
The operation is defined: digital-root addition (⊕) with dr(x) = x mod 9 (dr(9k)=9).
God (12) ⊕ Trinity (18) = 30 → dr(30)=3 = dr(12).
This is standard modular arithmetic, not invention. The loop is a theorem under the…[Read more] - Load More
