Lars

  • No unseen we don’t have access to a complete list of the laws of the universe. We can make as many claims about what we know, we cannot make any claim (negative or positive) about what we don’t know. Doing otherwise is arrogance.

  • Yes unseen, if you are saying that a God could not have all the qualities Christians say that he does…I agree. It is impossible. He cannot be all Good and all powerful because pointless evil and pointless suffering wouldn’t exist if he had both those qualities. There are many examples. That doesn’t prove that there is no God, or even a similar…[Read more]

  • I don’t see the logical contradiction.  If the future already exists, as a 4-d spacetime shape, then God would be free to mould it as He wishes, with His full knowledge.

    Indeed Unseen is not batting well today. God could exist outside of time and space if he really had these miraculous qualities so I don’t see why he couldn’t conceive of ev…[Read more]

  • It is the first time i have heard an atheist with a line like a theist.

    There is nothing admirable emulating theologians.

  • These things are not scientifically testable, much less provable.

    Indeed. I would say that just as people believing in magic and stating their fantasies are true with any degree of certainty is the result of evolutionary processes gone utterly haywire in the age of reason, so it is to want to claim certainty about that which we cannot…in the age…[Read more]

  • Unseen that’s just uber-arrogance. You don’t have absolute knowledge. We cannot answer the question whether God does or doesn’t exist until we achieve omniscience. Are you omniscient? Do you have proof you aren’t in a simulation created by God, a brain in a vat created by God? Under an incredible delusion in an environment where God could exist.…[Read more]

  • Unseen the difference is in the kind of questions that they ask and their methods of answering them. To say that philosophy avoids the practical is absurd. I’ve never taken a single course or read a single book that avoided practicals except for, and only sometimes, metaphysics.

  • Thanks, Reg!

  • Again, you have to measure the risk against how obsessed you are over the single issue. Participating in a revolution is extremely dangerous. The revolution could come and despite promises to change things so your single issue is addressed never comes (you are expendable once the revolution is a success). Your single issue could be addressed but…[Read more]

  • Unseen political philosophy IS dealing with problems in practical terms. What gave you the idea it was anything other than that?

  • Unseen the United States cannot have a third party without proportional representation which you don’t have. That and the stupid electoral college could be changed with constitutional amendments which, until that happens, you’ll have to do with your imperfect system. In any case, its certainly a LOT easier to get rid of a bad government needing a…[Read more]

  • Two problems with your original statement:

    You live in a country with two party rule (almost zero history of coalition ruling except rarely at a state level). In governments that have proportional representation smaller parties form and they almost invariably must rule together through compromise. That means a small party with a single issue can…[Read more]

  • Davis replied to the topic I am an Atheist. in the forum Atheism 5 years, 8 months ago

    We apply rational principles to almost every aspect of our lives. If someone claims you did something wrong you demand evidence. If someone claims a person pulled off an incredible accomplishment you ask for the evidence. And we use technology all the time which is the result of a fierce application of these rational/scientific principles…[Read more]

  • Strega replied to the topic Public School in the forum Advice 5 years, 8 months ago

    I have a friend who had her son when she was 42 at which point the father (who had wanted a child) upped and left leaving her as a single mom. Her son is very disruptive   She enrolled him in a Tai Kwan Doh class and it seems to have made a huge difference. He’s not perfect, by any means.  I know it’s an expense. What isn’t, these days?!  Howeve…[Read more]

  • If you don’t consider something to exist, you’re denying its existence, right?

    No Simon, there is an extremely important place in between where you don’t accept an argument but you don’t outright deny it. It is a position that religious people seem to be completely incapable of understanding when it comes to their particular God. Here are all sor…[Read more]

  • Additionally i argue that gender roles are highly flexible and we ought to seek equality and self actualization for all.

    An entirely obvious statement that seems to fly over a lot of people’s heads.

  • Unseen don’t be fucking ridiculous. Nobody is left alone to their natural inclinations. Every day we face countless pressures to conform to cultural norms, gender roles from our parents (who faces pressures from their parents and so on and so on and so on), not to mention at work, among friends, in public, at functions and so on. Many of these…[Read more]

  • Thanks, Reg!

  • Those differences, unseen, become trivial once we’ve overcome the need to spend all our day surviving from predators and feeding ourselves and most especially once we are self-aware and able to use reason. The physical differences are obvious but irrelevant. Our psychological differences are easily overcome if there is a willingness to do it. It’s…[Read more]

  • Those differences are heavily culturally enforced unseen. As women’s rights increase, women insist on making their own choices, challenging gender norms, living as they see fit and fighting the biases that keep gender differences so ingrained in our culture…miraculously we find all of those “fundamental” differences slowly disappearing. It would…[Read more]

  • Load More