Sunday School
Sunday School March 2nd 2025
This topic contains 88 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Unseen 1 month, 1 week ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 2, 2025 at 11:34 am #56518
Pew Research: Findings from the 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study.
There’s a raft of unconstitutional, religion-based legislation in the Idaho Capitol.
Texas records its first death from freedom freckles in 10 years.
‘Christian Nationalists’ have one little democratic point.
It’s OK if Elon fires you since “God has a plan and purpose for your life”.
Eyeing a friendly Supreme Court, Republicans push for the Ten Commandments in schools.
Vance shifts from Catholic pandering to catastrophic petulance.
World of Woo: Social Media Influencers and medical tests.
Environment: Do climate adaptation strategies get enough attention?
Earliest evidence for humans in rainforests.
Groundbreaking cancer treatment destroys 99% of cancer cells.
There can never be a theory of everything.
I only discovered the term Uti Possidetis Juris today. See also first video below.
Long Reads:
4 key steps to transform the USA back into a scientific nation.
Is God a Mushroom?
New evidence shows that how we evolve may also be evolving.
Amanda Knox: My wrongful murder conviction made me a better thinker.
Pig organs in people: The future of cross-species transplants.
Vaccines don’t cause Autism: How one fraudulent paper fueled decades of misinformation.
Who is Vladislav Klyushin?
Sunday Book Club: The Sirens’ Call.
Some photographs taken last week.
While you are waiting for the kettle to boil……
Podcast: Why belief in the paranormal persists and why skepticism is more important than ever. (15 minutes).
Coffee Break Videos: Uti Possidetis Juris and Israel. What Evolution really tells us about Life | A Conversation with Steven Pinker. The Death of the Fine-Tuning Argument. We might as well speak the truth. Humanists UK schools animation.
March 2, 2025 at 11:39 am #56520Have a great week folks!
“Freethinkers are those who are willing to use their minds without prejudice and without fearing to understand things that clash with their own customs, privileges, or beliefs. This state of mind is not common, but it is essential for critical thinking.”
– Leo Tolstoy.
March 2, 2025 at 12:07 pm #56521Sunday school today is awash with stories of how Amerika is bucking traditional conservative values such as guarding trade, the NATO alliance, honoring veterans and promoting tariff-free trade. Yet the spineless “conservatives” have their thumbs in the asses as we align with the likes of Putin and Kim.
I never thought a president could make Bush Jr seem like a sharp dude, but the Russian asset Trump has managed to do just that.
March 2, 2025 at 2:45 pm #56522Thanks, Reg!!
March 2, 2025 at 5:30 pm #56525Reg,
Uti Possidetis Juris and Israel.
Years ago in the Eighties, I saw a cartoon of the U.N. Building with cartoon balloons coming from it. The voices said something to the effect of:
“The Soviets have invaded Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq are at war, and Argentina has 20,000 children disappeared. What shall we do?”
“I move we condemn Israel!”
To paraphrase Dan Fogelberg: “Longer than there’ve submarines in the ocean, high than any jet ever flew, long than there’ve been satellites in the heavens, they’ve been at at war with the Jew.”
The Death of the Fine-Tuning Argument. We might as well speak the truth.
I too have been thinking about this most recently.
If the existence of life and human life in particular requires certain exact constants and parameters, grasped and understood as Natural Laws, and if life would go out of existence if the constants and parameters were off by the slightest degree–then how can there be the creation of life by that contradiction of Natural Laws known as miracles from a supernatural God? How can there be an Omnific God that can only create life with a fine-tuned Universe?
And this one really hits home: If life and human life in particular is the product of fine-tuning of the Universe by a supernatural God, why isn’t life fine-tuned to not have age, atrophy, and injury? Why can’t life be as eternal as the fine-tuned Universe itself?
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
TheEncogitationer. Reason: Correcting Spell-Check
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
TheEncogitationer. Reason: Fine-Tuning my clumsy fingers
March 2, 2025 at 5:52 pm #56528Robert,
Sunday school today is awash with stories of how Amerika is bucking traditional conservative values such as guarding trade, the NATO alliance, honoring veterans and promoting tariff-free trade. Yet the spineless “conservatives” have their thumbs in the asses as we align with the likes of Putin and Kim.
I never thought a president could make Bush Jr seem like a sharp dude, but the Russian asset Trump has managed to do just that.
If Trump gets the Nobel Peace Prize he’s wanting, he’ll continue making the Prize as meaningless as Yassir Arafat and Barack Obama.
March 2, 2025 at 6:08 pm #56529The only thing that spared Amanda Knox 28 years in prison was what’s known as the “pretty white girl effect” that got her face (and body) in the news and garnered her lots of sympathy. Had she been a black girl or a homely white girl, she’d have been toast.
Let’s face it: She’s an attractive woman today, but back then she was fucking gorgeous.
I’m not saying she didn’t get a raw deal or didn’t deserve the attention that in the end spared her a lengthy prison stay. I’m saying that it’s sad that that should have figured in at all.
BTW, I think the Brits, for some reason, still think she’s the killer.
March 2, 2025 at 6:18 pm #56530@_Robert_ Sunday school today is awash with stories of how Amerika is bucking traditional conservative values.
At the editorial meeting this morning I decided to tone down “the politics”. No-one disagreed with me 🙂
But you comment got me thinking. I started to answer it and somehow ended up with the following so I will publish it and be damned!
One of the main problems I see with the current state of politics in America is that both parties have drifted away from their traditional roots.
Many traditional conservatives feel that MAGA has hijacked their party. Traditional Conservatism (Edmund Burke) values gradual change, tradition, institutions, hierarchy, and civic responsibility. Burke saw the rule of law, respect for institutions, and moral order as fundamental to the stability of society. Burkean conservatives uphold free markets but see social stability and civic virtue as more important than short-term economic gains.
The MAGA movement is populist and nationalist. It distrusts elites and experts, favoring an anti-establishment ethos and economic protectionism. The attack on institutions, courts, and norms would be seen as reckless, akin to the French Revolution, which Burke abhorred.
If we look back to the 1980’s (OK Boomer), political commentators like Willam F. Buckley would likely reject MAGA as anti-conservative populism. George Will has explicitly denounced Trumpism, arguing that it abandons conservative principles in favor of authoritarian impulses.
MAGA is reactionary, not conservative—it seeks to “burn it all down” rather than preserve and improve institutions. It is a break, not a continuation, of conservatism. I don’t think this distinction has been made clear to the average citizen. When I hear MAGA politicians talk about respecting conservative values, I flinch. It seems to me that most voters have not noticed this shift and still contend that both MAGA and traditional conservatives are the same color of red. Whether the traditional GOP can reclaim its identity or whether MAGA reshapes it permanently remains to be seen.
Just as MAGA is not the “traditional” Republican Party, the modern Democratic Party has also shifted significantly from its historical roots. The distinction between being “liberal” and “woke” is important because it highlights the ideological changes within the party over time.
Traditional liberalism (rooted in John Stuart Mill, FDR, and JFK) emphasized individual rights, free speech, economic fairness, and civil liberties. Today, parts of the Democratic Party have embraced “woke” politics, which prioritize group identity, intersectionality, and equity over classical liberal principles like universalism and meritocracy. The Democratic Party once championed the working class, particularly through union support, New Deal policies, and economic populism. Today, much of the party’s elite leadership comes from coastal, urban, highly educated backgrounds, often alienating blue-collar workers who were once the party’s base. Traditional liberalism fought for open debate and free expression (e.g., the ACLU defending unpopular speech). Modern progressive activism often pushes for speech restrictions, cancel culture, and de-platforming people for ‘controversial’ views. Bill Clinton’s “Third Way” Democrats embraced market-friendly policies, tax cuts, and globalization, blending capitalism with social safety nets. The modern progressive wing (influenced by figures like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) rejects neoliberalism, advocating for higher taxes, wealth redistribution, and government expansion.
Like the GOP, it has been reshaped by new ideological movements. Many moderate liberals feel politically homeless, just as traditional conservatives feel abandoned by MAGA.
The GOP has moved from conservatism to populist nationalism (MAGA). The Democratic Party has shifted from classical liberalism to progressive identity politics. This shift might explain why many voters now feel politically adrift as neither party represents the historical principles they once stood for.
I guess I could argue that there are now 4 political parties in America. Maga and the GOP on one side with Center-left liberals and progressive\woke left on the other. Maybe having 4 distinct parties might be the way forward as the Democratic Party and the Republican Party no longer exist.
March 2, 2025 at 6:46 pm #56531@ Reg
The Democrats forgot that they need to give people reasons to vote for them rather than reasons to vote against them. The average American (myself included) doesn’t want to hear about pronouns, doesn’t want “females: with male bodies competing against their daughters in sports, doesn’t want to share restrooms with people of indeterminate or opposite gender, is uncomfortable with foreigners especially if they don’t speak English well or at all. I’m not saying that’s right but that it’s a reality to be taken into account to be successful in politics.
The Dems simply got ahead of their skis and are paying the price.
March 2, 2025 at 6:47 pm #56532@theencogitationer: On the design argument……
There is fundamental flaw in the Fine-Tuning Argument that many Christian apologists use. If a god created the universe, then it would not appear finely tuned—it would simply be as it was designed to be. The need to invoke fine-tuning actually undermines the premise of an all-powerful creator in several ways.
These are the arguments I regularly make to the hordes when they come a knockin’ to tell me the good news. From my coffee table notes:
If your God is omnipotent, then he could have created life under any conditions, even in a universe with completely different physical laws. The idea that the universe is “finely tuned” implies that even God had to get the settings just right, which contradicts the notion of unlimited divine power. If fine-tuning were real, we would expect life to be abundant and easily sustained, not limited to a thin biosphere on one small pale blue dot.
Evolutionary biology shows that life adapts to its environment rather than the environment being shaped for life. Life arises where conditions allow it, rather than conditions being designed for life. A puddle doesn’t assume the hole was made for it—it simply conforms to the shape of the hole.
Apologists tend to ignore the Weak Anthropic Principle: we observe a universe in which life can exist because we are here to observe it.
The Argument from Design (William Paley’s Watchmaker analogy) was an attempt to show that complex systems require a designer. It assumes order must come from intent, ignoring natural processes like self-organization and emergence. Darwin destroyed that argument by showing how natural selection produces complexity without a designer.
If the universe were perfectly fine-tuned, then:
No miracles would be necessary.
No divine interventions would be needed to correct things.
No suffering or natural disasters would exist.
Why do the apologists still use it?
It sounds Scientific – The Fine-Tuning Argument uses physics and probability to appear more rigorous than older theological arguments.
It appeals to Human Bias – People intuitively think design requires a designer because our brains are wired to recognize patterns.
It tries to “Push Back” the Question – Instead of proving a god exists, it tries to make atheists explain why the universe seems suitable for life. A “Gotcha” question.
To sum up I say: The need for fine-tuning implies constraints, which contradicts divine omnipotence. The better explanation is that life adapted to the universe, rather than the universe being designed for life. Please use science to tell me where I am wrong.
March 2, 2025 at 6:57 pm #56533@unseen – The Dems simply got ahead of their skis and are paying the price.
They paid the price because the GOP amplified their “wokeness”. It got major airtime on Faux News and the other platforms that MAGA tune in to. It was always headline news for MAGA even when only a small minority of the Dems had vocalized it. The GOP got voters focused on “this is what the Dems are concerned about”. The Democrats should have reused the brilliantly simple political messaging strategy that helped Bill Clinton defeat George H.W. Bush in 1992. James Carville’s famous phrase “It’s the economy, stupid” was a reminder to the Clinton campaign to stay focused on what truly mattered to voters: economic issues. Yes, Harris and Biden forgot that and forgot it very quickly.
March 2, 2025 at 7:28 pm #56534The mayor of Perugia in Italy where Meredith Kercher was murdered was annoyed that Knox filmed her “Blue Moon” documentary there. Knox did not bring shame to the town, its own police force did. The mayor was more concerned about the public image of the town being associated with the crime again than with the 16 years Knox had spent clearing her name. Knox spent 4 years in prison after being wrongfully convicted of murder. She earned about $4m for her memoirs and good for her. I think I recall some UK tabloids moralizing about it being “too much money”.
March 2, 2025 at 7:42 pm #56535Had she been a black girl or a homely white girl, she’d have been toast.
If she had been Black, she would have been treated worse by the police and the press. Beyond that, that’s a pretty misogynistic assessment. What do the Brits think? We’ve pretty much forgotten about it. I think it unfolded in a complex way and we followed it as it went along. I think she looks innocent, as in not guilty. She comes out of it pretty well, if she’s treated it as a learning experience.
March 2, 2025 at 7:53 pm #56536On the Nobel prize:
From the NYT:
On Sunday, Mr. Rubio leaned heavily on emotive language to push back against the critics who have since berated the Trump administration for the public display of hostility toward Mr. Zelensky, a wartime president who frames his battle against Russia’s invasion as a bulwark of Europe’s security and freedom. Mr. Rubio said he was “puzzled” by the “absurd” pushback on the administration and said Mr. Trump was being unfairly criticized when he was trying to prevent further destruction by bringing peace to the region.
Mr. Rubio sprinkled his comments with open rebukes of Mr. Zelensky. He said that the Ukrainian president “couldn’t contain himself” and had hindered Mr. Trump’s peace effort.
He said Mr. Zelensky as well as the critics of Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance — among whom are both Republican and Democratic lawmakers — needed to realize that the United States was “trying to help” Ukraine.
“The sooner people grow up and realize that, I think the more progress we’re going to be able to make,” Mr. Rubio said. He added that Mr. Trump would be considered for the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts if he were a Democrat.
March 2, 2025 at 8:53 pm #56537Reg,
There are, of course, other reasons to question “fine-tuning” for life.
For example, if another Element could take the place of Carbon as a hub for other Elements to bond and form self-sustaining, replicating bodies, then life may not have to be Carbon-based. If so, then Life, the Universe, ad Everything is not so “fine-tuned” as the advocates think.
Also, to paraphrase the movie title, there are A Million Ways to Die in the West and every other part of the Universe. If the Universe is “fine-tune” for us, why is it trying to kill us?
Basically, the Natural Universe and Supernatural explanations are mutually exclusive and contradictory.
-
This reply was modified 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.