MsBrenda
-
tom sarbeck posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoPB, scifi fans have wondrously productive imaginations.
AI’s taking over the universe is a stretch. Its making a repeating big bang rips the “fabric” to shreds little larger than molecules. -
PopeBeanie posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoA related post from a few years ago:
http://www.thinkatheist.com/profiles/blogs/cosmological-natural-selection-cnsMy long story short, assume AI ultimately takes over the universe, and devises a way to make a big bang repeat in a way that increases the chances of intelligent life evolving, perhaps even sooner than it did in this universe.
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic The Four Horsemen in the forum
Notable Atheists 7 years, 7 months agoUnseen wrote:
BTW, I notice that these posts haven’t gone away. What’s different?@Unseen, because these posts are like any regular post, in a topic. (And this topic also happens to exist within a group forum, but one wouldn’t necessarily notice that.)
If this still doesn’t make sense, I hope you can ask for more clarification, so we can even…[Read more]
-
Clearsky posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months ago -
Clearsky posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoWhat’s the deal with the ” Finely Tuned Universe ” theory ? Seems a lot of big cheeses in cosmology are talking about it?
-
-
Clearsky posted an update in the group
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoCan Science explain everything?
-
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic What is your favourite book on evolution? in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoSimon – I was at a lecture by Christof Koch yesterday on the future of consciousness. I will post more on his ideas later but here is a video you might like.
See also the link for Consciousness Redux.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic What is your favourite book on evolution? in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoHere’s an interesting Facebook post from just now by Steve Taylor, “transpersonal psychologist” (and psychology professor at Manchester University). You may or may not find him slightly out there: I prefer the term “speculative”.
I’ve been doing a lot of reading about evolution over the last few days (for an article I’m writing) and have learned…
-
Simon Paynton started the topic What is your favourite book on evolution? in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 7 months agoMine is “The Making of the Fittest – DNA and the ultimate forensic record of evolution” by Sean B Carroll. “By delving deep into the DNA record, Carroll reveals not just how the fittest survive but also how they are made.”
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoAh, the People of Science videos. Thanks, Robert. I have seen and enjoyed several of them.
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoFlavivirus implications are more “frightening” to theists than to atheists; we accept natural selection and its consequences.
Think MMO, means, motives, opportunities. The current crop of theists in America’s government seem determined to reduce the means and opportunities to cope with the consequences.
-
tom sarbeck replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoScience requires both deduction and induction.
One without the other — such as Albert Einstein’s thought experiments, or mathematics only, or theoretical physics — can and has resulted in flawed science and vast waste of taxpayers’ money.
-
Rodrigo Moreira Pavanelli joined the group
Notable Atheists 7 years, 8 months ago -
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months ago -
_Robert_ replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoI simply adore this video and it really is all about how science works and would also inspire anyone who is not afraid to think.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yEX_OI0xbQ
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoFlavivirus research (including Zika), from mid-2016.
-
PopeBeanie started the topic Working Sciences, Simple to Advanced in the forum
Science — the kind that requires evidence and reason. 7 years, 8 months agoI plan for this thread provide illustrations of how science works. I ask that any additional posts to this thread be made brief; to the point wrt the process(es) of observation, discovery, hypotheses, formulation of theory, experimentation, publication, or your views on the process itself.
The “simple to advanced” aspect to these posts gives us…[Read more]
-
wilshado joined the group
Notable Atheists 7 years, 8 months ago - Load More
Indeed it’s a stretch, but I can’t rule out that several billion years of AI wouldn’t trump it.
On a related topic–but yeah, a tangent… similar to Fermi’s Paradox, we might ask why we’ve not yet seen evidence of alien AI. IMO, the technology to *widely* propagate self-assembling AI bots would be infinitely more feasible than the glossy-eyed…[Read more]
[Drat! PB cannot fix his inevitable typos unless they’re in a Forum topic post.]