D
-
PopeBeanie replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
King Iyk wrote:
@Reg, The bottom line of our exchange is this: I was able to get the foremost intellectual advancement of the human race (AI) to attest to the validity of my demonstration—you were not. Simple.(Reg, it’s hard for me to resist responding here.)
Seems to me, you’re openly not interested in considering intellectual or p…[Read more]
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
It is patently clear you are incapable of reasoned debate. I am only replying for the sake of others that might be reading this from the sidelines.
“AI attested to it” is not a meaningful claim. LLMs are not intelligent systems. Just ask one if it is. They echo coherence, not correctness. If AI affirmations counted as validation, then nume…[Read more]
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
You said in the parting gift of your last paragraph that “The Bible’s God is Triune, demonstrated not assumed”.
But demonstrated how? All you have done is to show that patterns can be extracted from a text and that symbolic triad can be (re)arranged, Nothing is demonstrated.
“When treated as data rather than prose”….once again, this is a catego…[Read more]
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
There is so much wrong here that I am not sure where to start. I will pick some points out. The whole piece reminds me of what Dan Dennett called a ‘deepity’. Lots of big words too so I will try not to be too much of a sesquipedalian.
‘But conceptual analysis still carries a burden: a concept that does not exist in its source domain cannot gen…[Read more]
-
jakelafort replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
@ Robert
“This conservative move toward antisemitism was predictable.”
Yeah totally. I predicted it years ago.
And agree regarding rest of your take. Similarly it was true of the Iranian revolution. The stupid socialists/marxist were executed once the Shah was overthrown. No such thing as a “good….fill in the blank for racist ideologues.
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
jakelafort wrote:
King reminds me of the Progressives/Woke in their pathetic intellectualizing of their racism against Jews and in how they try to discredit state of Israel. Just give me a theist who is honest. I have faith which means i got nothing dude. Absolutely nothing. Give me Nazis. Sure there is a mythology but at base nobody gonna take… -
jakelafort replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
King reminds me of the Progressives/Woke in their pathetic intellectualizing of their racism against Jews and in how they try to discredit state of Israel. Just give me a theist who is honest. I have faith which means i got nothing dude. Absolutely nothing. Give me Nazis. Sure there is a mythology but at base nobody gonna take it seriously. Give…[Read more]
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
If I was on that flight I would start singing “Allahu Akbar” and if asked to stop,would then sue the airline for religious discrimination.
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
jakelafort wrote:
You guys have ripped King a new one. Chances he admits he is wrong?Never.
I just read a story about members of a church musical group who sang and played jesus worship music mid-flight. Fucking morons, the crew allowed it. It’s so awesome I live in a one party, christian nationalism fueled, authoritarian country that trashes…[Read more]
-
jakelafort replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
You guys have ripped King a new one.
Chances he admits he is wrong?
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
@simon – I am not trying to prove it false. I am evaluating whether it is textually grounded and conceptually coherent. I was doing conceptual analysis, not arguing metaphysics. The doctrine of the Trinity is not derivable from the text it claims as its source. My claim stands. irrespective of the existence or not o… -
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months ago
@Simon – I am not trying to prove it false. I am evaluating whether it is textually grounded and conceptually coherent. I was doing conceptual analysis, not arguing metaphysics. The doctrine of the Trinity is not derivable from the text it claims as its source. My claim stands, irrespective of the existence or not of the Christian God. I’m not c…[Read more]
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
jakelafort wrote:
Our democracy and its institutions are only as strong as we are. And it is plain obvious that ideology is running amok and imprinting human minds as efficiently rrr nearly as Konrad’s ducks. These mofos on either side can critique the other side but are utterly incapable of seeing the pile of shit they stand by. Ai and its i… -
jakelafort replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
Our democracy and its institutions are only as strong as we are. And it is plain obvious that ideology is running amok and imprinting human minds as efficiently rrr nearly as Konrad’s ducks. These mofos on either side can critique the other side but are utterly incapable of seeing the pile of shit they stand by.
Ai and its incorporation into the…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
Reg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
The Trinity presupposes a God-concept that the Bible itself never articulates.But that doesn’t prove the Trinity is wrong.
Can we atheists recognise the wrongness of a description of something we think doesn’t exist? Not even wrong?
-
Reg the Fronkey Farmer replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
The Trinity presupposes a God-concept that the Bible itself never articulates. The God presented in the Bible is a single personal agent, whereas the Trinity redefines God as a “tri-personal” being which is a category shift not made by the biblical authors.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
Simon Paynton wrote:
An AI proof isn’t proof.Unless it’s a dedicated theorem prover, or an AI program which has specifically been asked to prove a theorem, without flattering the user.
-
_Robert_ replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
TheEncogitationer wrote:
Robert:The real beneficial power of AI is medical diagnosis, genetic medicine, battlefield management, software development, etc. It is just as useless as an apologist, priest, preacher, or rabbi when it comes to the non-existent supernatural or the nebulous field of “metaphysics” that theists love to abuse.
I’m sure…
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic A Formal Mathematical Model of The Holy Trinity. in the forum Atheism 8 months, 1 week ago
TheEncogitationer wrote:
It puts out affirmation for every bit of nonsenseI think that AI flatters people.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School December 14th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 8 months, 1 week agoTheEncogitationer wrote:
I’m saying there was no Garden of Eden or “Golden Age” or “Noble Savagery”, whether terrifying, beautiful, or otherwise.No power, no oppression, no money, no patriarchy? Sounds great. It’s true that people died very young though.
- Load More