Samantha
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School June 28th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 10 months, 1 week agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
Mormon women are confused that men are allowing them to display porn shoulders. Where will it all end?In the comments people talk about how the worst part, in the new relaxation of modesty rules, is the change in God’s unchanging and immutable Word. How does that work? It’s a contradiction in someone’s world view.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School June 22nd 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 10 months, 2 weeks agoUnseen wrote:
Trump has a pathology. Psychopathology? Sociopathology? or a toxic blend of both? I think that’s for sure.He’s a textbook narcissist. His government is full of them. Hitler was, and Putin is, the malignant, sadistic kind. Trump has these tendencies, but his main motivation is just power and glory for himself and being Numb…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 10 months, 3 weeks agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
I know very few Irish people that really want to have Ulster “rejoin” the rest of Ireland.I think Queen Elizabeth I caused a shed-load of trouble.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 10 months, 3 weeks agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
Which men came out onto the streets to protest in any of these cases or to vent their feelings? None.“We’ll abuse our own women, thank you very much.” That’s a very informative answer Reg. What did you mean by
very few Irish people want to “get Ulster back”.
?
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agoSimon Paynton wrote:
I put it down to the sexual competition between males. That’s why they are slightly larger.I’ve shown this before. Pre-human australopithecine males had enormous canines compared with females, until they abruptly became almost even when the human ancestor arrived, 4-6 million years ago.
Human males are a lot le…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agoUnseen wrote:
The great bulk of violence, gun violence included, is perpetrated by the male gender.That’s true. Most violence comes from men. I put it down to the sexual competition between males. That’s why they are slightly larger.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agoTheEncogitationer wrote:
Occam’s Razor cuts those strings easily. One Universe with lots of unknowns is the best catch-all.I don’t buy Occam’s Razor all the time. I think it’s artificial. Something’s the way it is, not necessarily the simplest way.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agoUnseen wrote:
You could elimlinate almost all gun violence in America by simply forbidding anyone with an X chromosome to own or have access to firearms.Do you mean a Y chromosome? XX, XY? I see your point: gun violence is almost exclusively male.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agojakelafort wrote:
So hypothetically a scientific theory emerges and a consensus forms that a many worlds ‘reality’ is as solid as Darwin’s game changer.Surely we can never know. But wasn’t there a story about another universe that had bumped into ours?
When I bring up this point in William Lane Craig Facebook discussions, Christians say it’s a…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 25th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months agoPopeBeanie wrote:
Umm, I know it sounds hokey, but like worm-holes abide in another dimension, dude.Is it not possible to connect two points by travelling in a higher dimension? I’m not sure. A two-dimensional plane can be folded within three dimensions, we can connect two 3-d points by travelling in time. I’m pretty sure that if you go up a…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Trans women in sports. What's fair? in the forum Small Talk 11 months ago
Unseen wrote:
While one often hears “But they aren’t even 1% of those competing in women’s sports” as if the ethical issue is one of numbers. “It’s fair as long as there are no more than x% of them” is wrongheaded on its face. Wrong is wrong. Unfair is unfair.That’s true. I heard a feminist on the radio saying that trans people make up only a…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Trans women in sports. What's fair? in the forum Small Talk 11 months ago
TheEncogitationer wrote:
After all. if women and people of certain physiotypes were not just historically, but today are intrinsically in all circumstances victims of systemic oppression, why do some people want to be members of those victim categories?I imagine it’s irrelevant to a man who is born a woman psychologically. Rachel Dolezal maybe…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Trans women in sports. What's fair? in the forum Small Talk 11 months ago
Unseen wrote:
I think you are the one oversimplifying, because unsaid on your part is that we should just accept that split, but to do so is unjust to the biological females, because it’s not just sports.I agree with you:
Simon Paynton wrote:
Frankly, it would end a lof of trouble and hostility if trans people could have their own category in s… -
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Trans women in sports. What's fair? in the forum Small Talk 11 months ago
Unseen wrote:
When someone expresses the belief that they are not the gender biology gave them, like most beliefs, it is either true or false is it not?It’s not as simple as that. Sex is biological but gender is psychological and social. So someone can be born male and have a female psychological and social identity.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Trans women in sports. What's fair? in the forum Small Talk 11 months ago
We’re all sympathetic with trans people, but it’s a difficult dilemma to resolve satisfactorily. In the UK it’s just been decided legally that for some purposes, such as women’s safe spaces, a person’s biological sex is what matters and not their social and psychological gender. So, in effect, we’ve decided that for some purposes, you can’t c…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 4th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months, 1 week agoUnseen wrote:
You have to remember the difference in what they may believe to be moral.I think religious morality has plus and minus points. “To please God” or “to get into heaven” aren’t bad reasons for doing moral things.
But like you say, different people think different things are moral. The biggest drawback with religion is its t…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 4th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months, 1 week agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
“Name one moral action performed by a believer that could not have been done by a nonbeliever.”I think that’s not the point. It’s not either/or. It’s good that both exist.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 4th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months, 1 week ago_Robert_ wrote:
Simon, isn’t the main point of Christianity to evade responsibility for immoral behavior? No matter what you do, just believe and you will be OK. That’s why Jesus lives mostly in prisons. It’s why evangelical preachers do the shittiest things…and then often issue a statement and then just get on with the grifting.It’s not news th…[Read more]
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 4th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months, 1 week agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
Your point about Christians and the stereotype of atheists lacking a moral compass is a bugbear of mine.Our motivation to be moral is the same as that of Christians: i.e., 1) conscience – the motive to follow moral and ethical principles; 2) consequences of our actions for ourselves and others.
-
Simon Paynton replied to the topic Sunday School May 4th 2025 in the forum
Sunday School 11 months, 1 week agoReg the Fronkey Farmer wrote:
• When someone doesn’t conform to the group’s moral norms (in this case, religious belief), our brains flag them as risky.• That “risk” is translated into perceived harm.
• Result? Atheists are not just “wrong,” they’re “dangerous.”
That makes sense. I’d never thought of it that way. On that basis, there’s a ver…[Read more]
- Load More